Assessing credit risk – Identifying significant increases in credit risk and credit impairment
The assessment of credit risk – the risk of a borrower defaulting – is usually an integral part of measuring expected credit losses (ECLs) under IFRS 9 Financial Instruments. Except for some trade and lease receivables, a company needs to assess at each reporting date whether the credit risk on a financial instrument has increased significantly since initial recognition. If it has, then ECLs are recognised over the expected life of the exposure; if it has not, then ECLs are limited to those over the next 12 months of the life of the exposure. A company also needs to assess whether an exposure is credit-impaired. [IFRS 22.214.171.124]
Similar to other aspects of ECL measurement, assessing whether there is a significant increase in credit risk (SICR) since initial recognition is forward-looking and considers reasonable and supportable information that is available without undue cost or effort at the reporting date. [Insights 126.96.36.199]
The challenge for companies is to incorporate into the SICR assessment forward-looking information relating to the economic impact of the COVID-19 coronavirus outbreak that is available without undue cost or effort at the reporting date.
Companies are required to incorporate forward-looking information that is available without undue cost or effort into their assessment of whether credit risk on a financial instrument has increased significantly. This may be particularly challenging to do for the economic impact of COVID-19.
Identifying SICR is usually material for banks and other financial institutions. Many banks calculate explicit probabilities of default (PDs) for individual exposures and use these to perform quantitative assessments of SICR. They will need to consider whether they can incorporate COVID-19-related changes in the risk of default into PDs for individual exposures on a timely basis. [IFRS 188.8.131.52]
Companies also need to consider qualitative factors when identifying SICR. For example, changes in customer behaviour or requests for payment holidays or credit limit increases may indicate SICR or credit impairment. [IFRS 9.B5.5.18]
If a company is not able to identify key drivers of credit risk on an individual instrument basis, then it may need to assess SICR on a collective basis. For example, it might need to consider whether, on the basis of the information available at the reporting date, credit risk has increased significantly for all or some borrowers in certain industries or regions and, if so, transfer all or a portion of those exposures to Stage 2 (or Stage 3 if they are credit-impaired). [IFRS 9.B5.5.16]
Government assistance provided directly to borrowers might reduce the probability of a borrower defaulting and so avoid SICR occurring in some cases. However, when assessing whether credit risk has increased significantly, the probability of recovering cash flows under a financial guarantee that is integral to the terms of the financial asset is not considered. This means that expected recovery of loans to customers from government guarantees might be included in the measurement of ECLs, but this guarantee may not reduce the probability of default or avoid SICR occurring.
Companies with exposures to governments, including investments in sovereign bonds, will need to update their measurements of ECLs and assessments of whether there is a significant increase in credit risk. COVID-19 is putting pressure on government finances and the pressure may become more intense over the coming months – this may impact the assessment of sovereign credit risk. The likelihood of SICR occurring in the near future will be elevated for sovereign exposures that are at the lower end of the investment grade rating range with a negative outlook. [IFRS 184.108.40.206]
Modifications and forbearance
As borrowers face greater risk of financial stress from the consequences of COVID-19, they might approach lenders to ask for concessions against the current terms of their borrowings. For example, they might request relaxation of covenants, delayed repayment of interest or principal, or a reduction in the interest rate. Governments might encourage banks to provide concessions for particular types of customers.
Both lenders and borrowers will need to analyse any such arrangements carefully to determine the appropriate accounting – i.e. they will need to assess whether:
If a government provides assistance to a lender and this in turn enables the lender to provide support to its customers, then the lender will need to consider how to account for that assistance – in particular, whether government grant accounting under IAS 20 Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance is required. [Insights 7.8.130]
A company is required to disclose the nature and extent of risks arising from financial instruments and how it manages those risks. Therefore, a company will need to explain the significant impacts of COVID-19 on the risks arising from financial instruments and on how it is managing those risks. It will need to use judgement to determine the specific disclosures that are relevant to its business and necessary to meet these objectives. [IFRS 7.31]
Examples of specific disclosures include the following.
See our related article ESMA guidance on the COVID-19 impact on reporting ECLs.
The International Accounting Standards Board has published guidance on the application of IFRS 9 in the context of COVID-19.
References to ‘Insights’ mean our publication Insights into IFRS
© 2020 KPMG IFRG Limited is a UK company, limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. KPMG IFRG Limited, registered in England No 5253019. Registered office: 15 Canada Square, London, E14 5GL, UK.
KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”) is a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.