A federal judge has vacated a rule by the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) that would have significantly increased the prevailing wage paid to workers sponsored for PERM labor certification, or H-1B, H-1B1, or E-3 nonimmigrant visa classification. Although the DOL had previously announced that it was going to delay the implementation of this rule until at least November 14, 20221, the federal court’s recent ruling stops its implementation altogether. The federal judge will continue presiding over the challenge against the DHS involving an H-1B lottery prioritization rule2.
WHY THIS MATTERS
If the DOL’s rule had been implemented, it would have significantly raised the minimum wages that employers would have had to pay workers sponsored for PERM labor certification, or H-1B, H-1B1, or E-3 nonimmigrant visa classifications3. If employers were unable to either meet the new wage requirements or identify suitable alternative wage sources, then budgetary constraints could necessitate limiting sponsorship of employees in the H-1B, H-1B1, E-3, or PERM programs.
A Deeper Look
While the federal court’s ruling stops the DOL from implementing the wage increase rule altogether in its current format, the decision does not prevent the DOL from revising the rule at a later time.
The DOL is in the process of reviewing the comments it received from the public regarding the potential changes to the prevailing wage methodology and will further weigh the legal and policy issues raised by the change.
Despite the agency’s return to the drawing board, there is cautious optimism that the DOL may abandon the increases in prevailing wage calculations altogether, or implement a rule that would not be as detrimental to employment-based immigration to the United States.
Now, the shift in focus is on the ongoing litigation to the DHS’s H-1B lottery prioritization rule. While each matter is adjudicated on its own merits, there is once again cautious optimism that there may be a favorable ruling that would stop the DHS’s planned implementation of this rule.
KPMG Law LLP in Canada is tracking this matter closely. We will endeavor to keep readers of GMS Flash Alert posted on any important developments as and when they occur.
1 For prior coverage, see GMS Flash Alert 2021-144, May 14, 2021.
2 To see a detailed explanation of the DHS’s H-1B prioritization rule, see GMS Flash Alert 2021-013, January 17, 2021.
3 To see a detailed explanation of what these minimum wages would have looked like, see GMS Flash Alert 2020-424, October 7, 2020.
* Please note the KPMG International member firm in the United States does not provide immigration or labour law services. However, KPMG Law LLP in Canada can assist clients with U.S. immigration matters.
The information contained in this newsletter was submitted by the KPMG International member firm in Canada.
Connect with us
Want to do business with KPMG?
Stay up to date with what matters to you
Gain access to personalized content based on your interests by signing up todaySign up today
© 2022 KPMG LLP, a Canada limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”) is a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.
GMS Flash Alert is a Global Mobility Services publication of the KPMG LLP Washington National Tax practice. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organization. KPMG International Limited is a private English company limited by guarantee and does not provide services to clients. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.