United States – Changes to H-1B Visa Program Anticipated
US – Changes to H-1B Visa Program Anticipated
On September 3, 2020, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security submitted a proposed rule to the Office of Management and Budget aimed at revising the H-1B visa program and eligibility criteria, which would include a revision to the definition of “specialty occupation” in order to increase focus on “obtaining the best and the brightest foreign nationals via the H-1B program.” The proposed H-1B changes are likely to create additional onerous steps and administrative obligations for H-1B employers as well as the H-1B visa holders.
On September 3, 2020, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) submitted a proposed rule to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) aimed at revising the H-1B visa program and eligibility criteria.1 As the rule now awaits review by OMB, the proposed regulatory changes to the H-1B program are one step closer to publication in the Federal Register to be implemented by the DHS.
While the text of the rule is not publicly available, according to prior regulatory announcements from the DHS, the proposed rule is expected to revise the definition of what is considered a “specialty occupation” for H-1B visa purposes as well as redefine the employer-employee relationship criteria. (For prior coverage on the agency’s Spring 2020 regulatory agenda, see GMS Flash Alert 2020-310, July 10, 2020.)
WHY THIS MATTERS
In sum, the proposed H-1B changes are likely to create additional onerous steps for H-1B employers as well as the H-1B visa holders. Both employers and H-1B beneficiaries could be required to submit more comprehensive and detailed documentation in support of an H-1B petition.
More on Anticipated Changes to H-1B Program
The proposed rule, titled “Strengthening the H-1B Nonimmigrant Visa Classification Program,” now awaits review by the OMB and could be published by the end of the year, or earlier. While the text of the rule is not publicly available, it is widely anticipated the proposed rule will formalize previously-announced regulatory objectives from the DHS impacting the H-1B visa program, such as:
- A revision to the definition of “specialty occupation” in order to increase focus on “obtaining the best and the brightest foreign nationals via the H-1B program.” It is anticipated the proposal seeks to adjust the definition of “specialty occupation” to focus more heavily on the nexus between the position’s educational degree requirements, the job description, and the degree held by the H-1B beneficiary – with the effect of potentially narrowing the types of positions that may ultimately qualify for H-1B visa classification.
- A revision to the definition of the employer-employee relationship is expected to narrow the types of employment arrangements eligible for H-1B visa sponsorship, and possibly limit placement of H-1B workers offsite at third-party locations. The rule may also reinstitute onerous documentary requirements for employers whose H-1B workers perform work at third-party client worksites – requirements the DHS earlier this year agreed to suspend pursuant to a settlement agreement reached between the USCIS and a non-profit organization that represents the interests of IT companies.2
- Establishing new wage and Labor Condition Application (LCA) requirements “designed to ensure employers pay appropriate wages to H-1B visa holders.”
Public Input on Changes and Next Steps for Employers?
The DHS intends to publish the new H-1B regulation as an interim final rule meaning the public, including H-1B employers, would not have the opportunity to provide public comment on the impact of the rule. Further, as an interim final rule, the new regulation could be effective immediately upon publication without a standard 30-day delayed implementation period. However, once the regulation is reviewed by OMB and published in the Federal Register, the proposed rule could possibly face court challenge from employers and industries that utilize the H-1B visa program.
With an understanding of the possible changes to the H-1B program, employers and foreign nationals can proactively work with immigration counsel to develop strategies to mitigate its impact, especially if the proposed rule is to take effect immediately. Employers and immigration counsel should be prepared to anticipate that the proposed regulation will narrow the types of positions and employment arrangements that may qualify for H-1B visa classification.
We Will Monitor the Situation and Keep Readers Informed
KPMG Law LLP in Canada will be carefully monitoring any guidance provided by DHS regarding the proposed regulatory changes to the H-1B visa program. We will endeavor to keep readers of GMS Flash Alert posted on any important developments as and when they occur.
1 See the text and status of “Strengthening the H-1B Nonimmigrant Visa Classification Program” by clicking here.
2 See our prior GMS Flash Alert 2020-258 (May 29, 2020) “United States – Settlement Reached between H1-B IT Employers and USCIS.”
* Please note that KPMG LLP (U.S.) does not provide any immigration or labor law services. However, KPMG Law LLP in Canada can assist clients with U.S. immigration and labor matters.
The information contained in this newsletter was submitted by the KPMG International member firm in Canada.
To subscribe to GMS Flash Alert, fill out the subscription form.
© 2022 KPMG LLP, an Ontario limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.
For more detail about the structure of the KPMG global organization please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.
GMS Flash Alert is a Global Mobility Services publication of the KPMG LLP Washington National Tax practice. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organization. KPMG International Limited is a private English company limited by guarantee and does not provide services to clients. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.