The COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic has evolved rapidly in 2020 and it impacts how companies evaluate and disclose events after the reporting date (‘subsequent events’). Depending on a company’s reporting date, the impacts of the COVID-19 outbreak could be adjusting or non-adjusting events.
Under IAS 10 Events After the Reporting Period, events, both favourable and unfavourable, that occur between the reporting date and the date when the financial statements are authorised for issue require disclosure or possibly affect recognition and measurement in the financial statements. [Insights 2.9.20, 2.9.30]
IAS 10 identifies two types of events.
|Events after the reporting date||Definition||Financial statement effects|
Those that provide evidence of conditions that existed at the reporting date
|Adjust the amounts recognised in the financial statements|
|Non-adjusting events||Those that are indicative of conditions that arose after the reporting date||
Disclose the nature of the event and an estimate of its financial effect, or a statement that such an estimate cannot be made
Therefore, companies need to evaluate all events that occurred after their reporting date and assess:
Companies need to exercise significant judgement in determining which events after the reporting date are adjusting events.
Considerations for assessing events after the reporting period
Click to enlarge image (JPEG)
Impact at reporting date(s)
31 December 2019 and 31 January 2020
For 31 December 2019 financial statements, the financial reporting effects of the COVID-19 outbreak are generally non-adjusting events (with the exception of going concern) because the significant changes in business activities and economic conditions occurred as a result of events arising after the reporting date – e.g. actions taken by governments and the private sector to respond to the COVID-19 outbreak.
Certain events did occur before 31 December 2019 – e.g. the Wuhan Municipal Health Committee issued an urgent notice about the virus on 30 December 2019 and cases were reported to WHO on 31 December 2019. However, the announcement by WHO that the coronavirus was a global health emergency was made on 30 January 2020 – i.e. after the end of a 31 December reporting period – and measures taken by many national governments followed this announcement. Many actions taken by governments and the private sector to respond to the outbreak also followed after 31 December 2019. Therefore, based on information about the outbreak that was reasonably available as at 31 December 2019, it is likely that market participants would have made either no adjustments to their assumptions, or only inconsequential changes, based on their assessments of the available information and associated risks as at that date.
The effects of the COVID-19 outbreak did not have a significant impact on global markets and share prices until after 31 January 2020. Accordingly, concluding that developments after 31 January 2020 provide more information about the circumstances that existed at 31 January reporting dates – and are therefore considered adjusting events under IAS 10 – will be challenging unless the COVID-19 outbreak had a significant impact on the company as at 31 January (e.g. the company had significant operations in China). If management determines that developments after 31 January 2020 are adjusting events, then this will probably be a significant judgement that would require clear disclosure, including the reasons why management concluded that these developments are adjusting events.
Subsequent periods – Including 29 February and 31 March 2020
For companies with reporting periods ending in February or March 2020, and calendar year end companies reporting in the first quarter of 2020, the COVID-19 outbreak is likely to be a current-period event that will require ongoing evaluation to determine the extent to which developments after the respective reporting date should be recognised in that reporting period.
As the impacts of the COVID-19 outbreak continue to evolve, capturing events that relate specifically to conditions that existed at or before the reporting date – i.e. adjusting events – will require careful assessment. To do that, companies need to carefully assess their specific facts and circumstances to identify events that generally represent the culmination of a series of conditions that existed at or before the reporting date.
For material non-adjusting events, companies are required to disclose the nature of the event and an estimate of its financial effect, or a statement that an estimate cannot be made. A non-adjusting event is considered material if it is of such importance that non-disclosure would affect the ability of the financial statements’ users to make proper evaluations and decisions. [Insights 126.96.36.199]
As the date of authorisation moves further from the reporting date, users might expect that a company would have more information available to disclose an estimate of the financial effects of a non-adjusting event.
When assessing the impact of COVID-19 events after the reporting date, management needs to do the following.
References to ‘Insights’ mean our publication Insights into IFRS
© 2020 KPMG IFRG Limited is a UK company, limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. KPMG IFRG Limited, registered in England No 5253019. Registered office: 15 Canada Square, London, E14 5GL, UK.
KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”) is a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.