United States – Bill Seeks to Remove Some Countries’ Limits for Green Cards
United States – Bill Seeks to Remove Some Countries’ Li
This report covers new legislation being considered by the U.S. Congress that would modify the per-country cap on family-based immigrant visas and the quota on employment-based immigrant visas.
To subscribe to GMS Flash Alert, fill out the subscription form.
On July 10, 2019, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill titled the “Fairness for High-Skilled Immigrants Act of 2019” (H.R. 1044), which seeks to increase the per-country cap on family-based immigrant visas from 7 percent to 15 percent and to further eliminate the 7-percent country quota on employment-based immigrant visas. This bill passed in the House by a wide margin and will now go to the Senate for vote, before it can be enacted into law.1
WHY THIS MATTERS
H.R. 1044 would have the effect of a large number of Indian and Chinese nationals becoming eligible to file applications for permanent residence instead of being subject – as is currently the case – to significantly long periods of waiting for their immigrant visas to become available. It is anticipated that Indian and Chinese nationals will benefit from this bill. However, other foreign nationals could experience longer wait times to receive their immigrant visas if this bill passes Congress and is signed into law.
Currently, the U.S. Department of State sets a cap on the number of immigrant visas issued for each country. Only 7 percent of the total number of employment-based immigrant visas can be assigned to the nationals of any single country. Demand for immigrant visas from individuals born in India and the People’s Republic of China (“China”) is significantly greater than the supply provided by this quota. Accordingly, immigrant visa priority dates for individuals born in these countries are commonly and significantly retrogressed and they must wait years before their priority date is current so that they can apply for permanent residence.
Individuals born in countries other than India, the People’s Republic of China, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Philippines, and Vietnam are usually eligible to apply for permanent residence concurrently with or soon after the filing of their employment-based immigrant petitions.
H.R. 1044 does not make additional immigrant visas available to clear the current backlog but rather seeks to eliminate the 7-percent per-country cap on employment-based immigrant visas and to increase the per-country cap on family-based immigrant visas from 7 percent of the total number of visas available that year to 15 percent.
If H.R.1044 is signed into law, it would create a single queue, per employment-based immigrant visa category, for all nationals irrespective of country of birth, instead of the separate queues for each country in each employment–based preference category currently in place.
A companion bill, S. 386 is presently under negotiations in the U.S. Senate.
We at KPMG Law LLP are tracking this matter closely and will keep readers posted on any further developments.
1 For the text of the bill, its status and related legislation, click here.
* Please note that KPMG LLP (U.S.) does not provide any immigration services or legal services. However, KPMG Law LLP in Canada can assist clients with U.S. immigration matters.
The information contained in this newsletter was submitted by the KPMG International member firm in Canada.
© 2022 KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
GMS Flash Alert is a Global Mobility Services publication of the KPMG LLP Washington National Tax practice. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organization. KPMG International Limited is a private English company limited by guarantee and does not provide services to clients. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.