The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit today affirmed a decision of the U.S. Tax Court that had sustained a deficiency against an estate for overstating the amount of a charitable deduction and sustained an accuracy-related penalty.
The case is: Dieringer v. Commissioner, No. 16-72640 (9th Cir. March 12, 2019). Read the Ninth Circuit’s decision [PDF 84 KB]
In this estate tax case, the IRS assessed a deficiency against the decedent’s estate for overstating the amount of a charitable contribution to a private foundation. The estate had claimed an $18.2 million charitable deduction based on the value of assets earmarked for the foundation, but the foundation received assets worth only $6.4 million for a tax savings of about $4.1 million.
Thus, the estate’s executor and heir declared a large charitable deduction based on the value of estate property at the time of death, “…only to manipulate the property for personal gain, deliver assets to the charity worth substantially less than those claimed as a deduction, and receive a tax windfall in the process.” The Tax Court sustained the deficiency.
The executor contended that the Tax Court should have taken into account events that occurred after the decedent’s death in determining the value of the charitable deduction.
The Ninth Circuit looked to its decision in Ahmanson Foundation v. United States (“the principle that the testator may only be allowed a deduction for estate tax purposes for what is actually received by the charity”) to affirm the Tax Court’s decision upholding the reduction of the charitable deduction and the deficiency assessment. The Ninth Circuit found no clear error in the Tax Court’s finding that there was no evidence of a significant decline in the economy that would have decreased the value of the property being donated. The Ninth Circuit also found no error in the Tax Court’s upholding of the accuracy-related penalty.
© 2019 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”) is a Swiss entity.
Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.