March decisions clarify how potential amendments would apply and when initial relief would end
Standard setters continue to consider the effects of unprecedented reform of interbank offered rates (IBOR) – the benchmark interest rates that underlie many financial instruments – on existing financial reporting requirements.
The International Accounting Standards Board (the Board) had previously tentatively decided to amend the financial instruments standards – IFRS 9 Financial Instruments and IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement – to provide limited relief regarding financial instruments qualifying for hedge accounting in the lead up to IBOR reform. The Board made further tentative decisions at its March meeting clarifying how the initial relief would be applied and when it would end.
“The Board’s decisions in March shed more light on its thinking about how the proposed changes to hedge accounting would be applied. It’s time for preparers of financial statements to get ready to comment on the forthcoming exposure draft and communicate any concerns they may have.”
KPMG’s global IFRS financial instruments leader
The Board stated its intention that applying the targeted relief would not be a choice. Rather, the relief would be applied to all affected new and existing hedging relationships of interest rate risk on a mandatory basis.
This means that companies would be required to disclose the extent of the impact of the targeted relief on their affected hedging relationships for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2020.
Uncertainty with respect to IBOR cash flows may persist for a long time and vary across jurisdictions. For example, the Board discussed how the presence of fall-back clauses and amendments to contractual terms may remove some – but possibly not all – of the uncertainty around the timing and amount of IBOR cash flows.
The Board tentatively agreed that – in most cases – the proposed initial relief would end at the earlier of when:
However, the relief requiring risk components to be separately identifiable at inception of the hedging relationship but not subsequently would always be applied until the hedging relationship is terminated.
Questions remain about whether the end of this first-phase relief will trigger de-designation – these concerns were not addressed at the meeting. The staff has indicated that amending hedge documentation for changes in the hedged item or hedged risk will be covered in the second phase of the Board’s IBOR reform project.
As discussed at the February meeting, the Board’s proposed targeted relief is intended to apply to a company’s prospective assessments and not affect measurement. A Board member clarified at the March meeting that a company performing a retrospective assessment under IAS 39 would assume that the cash flows used for measuring the hedged item are the existing IBOR-based cash flows.
The Board intends to publish an exposure draft in May 2019, followed by a 45-day comment period. Therefore, it’s important that preparers and users of financial statements read the Board’s decisions and get ready to comment on the proposals to ensure that any concerns they may have are communicated to the Board.
The Board intends to issue final amendments to IFRS 9 and IAS 39 at the end of this year. Issues affecting financial reporting after new benchmark rates are in effect will be addressed in the second phase of the project.
Speak with your usual KPMG contact to find out more about the Board’s deliberations and visit home.kpmg/IBORreform to keep up to date with the latest news and discussion.
© 2019 KPMG IFRG Limited is a UK company, limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. KPMG IFRG Limited, registered in England No 5253019. Registered office: 15 Canada Square, London, E14 5GL, UK.
KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”) is a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.