The General Court of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) today released a judgment that rejected the European Commission’s decision to classify a tax regime applicable to four Spanish professional football clubs as “state aid.”
The judgments were issued in: Athletic Club v. Commission, T-679/16, and Fútbol Club Barcelona v. Commission, T-865/16.
As noted in a related CJEU release [PDF 167 KB], all Spanish professional football clubs were required by a 1990 law to convert to sports public limited companies (SPLCs). The intention was to encourage more responsible management of the football club activities.
An exception was provided for professional sports clubs that had achieved a positive result for the tax years preceding the Spanish law. These clubs were permitted to continue to operate as sports clubs. Four Spanish professional football clubs chose that option. Accordingly, as non-profit organisations and in contrast to SPLCs, their income was taxed at a specific rate that was, until 2016, lower than the rate applicable to SPLCs.
In 2016, the European Commission declared that Spain had unlawfully implemented state aid in the form of a corporation tax privilege in favour of these four professional football clubs. According to the EC, the regime was incompatible with the internal market, and it ordered Spain to discontinue the scheme and to recover the aid granted from the recipients.
The football clubs brought an action against the EC’s decision before the General Court of the European Union. With today’s judgment, the General Court annuled the EC’s decision with respect to two of the football clubs. Another action was dismissed.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.