EU: Input VAT recovery, head office and branch in separate countries
Input VAT recovery (CJEU judgment)
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in a January 2019 judgment resolved a value added tax (VAT) dispute between the taxpayer and the French VAT authorities concerning how the expense allocation of a branch located in France (whereas the head office was located in the UK) would be determined in order to calculate the input VAT recovery right.
Input VAT recovery issue
The taxpayer’s UK head office disposed of a VAT-registered branch in France. The French branch provided two categories of supplies:
- Banking and financial services to local clients
- Supplies to the UK head office (against which the branch received cash transfer —this included the costs incurred by the branch for the provision of the services to the UK head office)
At issue was the input VAT recovery of the French branch on the costs incurred for the provision of the supplies to its UK head office. There were two questions referred to the CJEU:
- Question 1 referred to the CJEU by the French State Council (Conseil d’Etat) aimed at determining the deductible proportion that the French branch must apply to an expenditure borne in relation to its UK head office solely.
- Question 2 concerned the deductible proportion applicable to the general costs of the French branch when these costs were used both for transactions conducted by the branch in France and for the transactions of the UK (foreign) head office.
The CJEU, regarding the input VAT recovery right of the French branch, conducted a two-step analysis based on the type of expenses incurred by the branch:
- Expenses incurred exclusively for a specific part of the activity of the UK head office
- Expenses incurred for both the activity of the UK head office and the French branch
Read TaxNewsFlash
KPMG observation
Given the CJEU judgment, the calculation methods recommended would not be easy to implement by taxable persons. Rather, taxable persons having an establishment in another EU country and bearing VAT on costs in that country will now need to establish specifically how these supplies give right to deduction in both countries. Furthermore, this would imply sufficient knowledge of the other relevant country’s law in each case. Finally, certain issues remain unanswered. Therefore, situations when an establishment located outside the EU or when the head office and/or the branch would be members of a VAT group remain unsolved.
The recommended calculations could possibly result in greater complexity for taxpayers with head office-branch structures.
Read a February 2019 report prepared by the KPMG member firm in Luxembourg
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.
