The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) posted a draft “practical compliance guideline” (PCG) that examines transfer pricing issues related to inbound distribution arrangements.
The draft practical compliance guideline—PCG-2018/D8—outlines the ATO approach to transfer pricing outcomes associated with certain activities of inbound distributions including:
These activities, along with any related activities involving the provision of ancillary services, are referred to in the draft PCG as “inbound distribution arrangements.” The draft PCG states that the ATO will use this as a framework for assessing the transfer pricing risk of inbound distribution arrangements, with the assessment to reflect a combination of quantitative and qualitative factors.
According to the draft PCG, if the ATO were to rate inbound distribution arrangements as having a low transfer pricing risk, the taxpayer could expect that the ATO would generally not apply compliance resources to review the transfer pricing outcomes of these arrangements. However, if the inbound distribution arrangements are not within the low transfer pricing risk category, a taxpayer could expect that the ATO would monitor, test, and verify the transfer pricing outcomes of the arrangements. The higher the risk rating, the more likely the ATO would be to review the arrangements as a matter of priority.
The draft PCG is limited to the transfer pricing risks associated with inbound distribution arrangements. It does not affect the ATO compliance approach to other tax issues that might arise in connection with inbound distribution arrangements (for example, the existence of withholding tax obligations or the application of the general anti-avoidance rule). If it is determined that the inbound distribution arrangements pose a risk under other tax provisions, the ATO would be expected to apply compliance resources to review the arrangements.
Having a low-risk rating under this draft PCG does not necessarily mean that the transfer pricing outcomes are correct or that the taxpayer has a reasonably arguable position. Equally, having a high-risk rating under this PCG does not necessarily mean that the inbound distribution arrangements fail to comply with Australia's transfer pricing rules. The ATO, having regard to particular circumstances, may accept that the transfer pricing outcomes are reasonable.
Taxpayers may use the framework set out in the PCG to:
Read a November 2018 report [PDF 189 KB] prepared by the KPMG member firm in Australia
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.