The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit today affirmed a determination of the U.S. Tax Court, holding in part that a conservation easement did not satisfy the perpetuity requirement of section 170(h)(5)(A) and, thus, that the donation of the conservation easement did not qualify for a deduction.
The case is: PBBM-Rose Hill, Ltd. v. Commissioner, No, 17-60276 (5th Cir. August 14, 2018). Read the Fifth Circuit’s decision [PDF 225 KB] (33 pages)
The taxpayer claimed for the 2007 tax year a charitable contribution deduction of over $15 million for its donation of a conservation easement of certain land that was part of a country club in South Carolina. On examination, the IRS disallowed the deduction for the conservation easement. Subsequently, the Tax Court concluded that the easement was not exclusively for conservation purposes, among other findings.
On appeal, the Fifth Circuit affirmed the Tax Court’s decision. While the Fifth Circuit found that the easement was “for conservation purposes” (as required by section 170(h)(1)(C)), the appeals court concluded that the contribution was not “protected in perpetuity” (as required by section 170(h)(5)(A)) because the easement deed contained an extinguishment provision. In other words, the appeals court held that the contribution protected the conservation purpose of preserving land for outdoor recreation by the general public, but the easement did not satisfy the perpetuity requirement.
The Fifth Circuit also held that the Tax Court did not err in its valuation of the easement or with respect to its determination that a valuation-related penalty applied.
© 2020 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”) is a Swiss entity.
Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.