The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit today reversed a decision of the U.S. Tax Court that upheld the then-applicable Treasury regulations as valid. The D.C. Circuit reversed finding that the regulations “unreasonably interpreted the Code.”
At issue were regulations promulgated in 2003* under section 883 concerning an exemption available to certain foreign corporations on U.S.-source gross transportation income if a certain percentage of the taxpayer’s stock was owned by residents of a country that provided a reciprocal tax exemption. The then-applicable regulations, however, prohibited any consideration of “bearer shares” (securities owned by whoever holds physical certificates issued by the company) in determining whether a sufficient amount of a foreign shipper’s stock was owned by qualifying shareholders. The D.C. Circuit concluded that the 2003 regulations did not justify treating all bearer shares as incapable of proving ownership, and that the regulations were “unreasonable and therefore invalid under Chevron Step Two.”
The case is: Good Fortune Shipping SA v. Commissioner, No. 17-1160 (D.C. Cir. July 27, 2018). Read the D.C. Circuit’s decision [PDF 74 KB]
*The exclusion rule in the 2003 regulations was revised by regulations issued in 2010.
The taxpayer—a foreign corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands—issued its stock shares in bearer form. In other words, all of the taxpayer’s stock was made up of bearer shares.
The taxpayer on its Form 1120-F, U.S. Income Tax Return for a Foreign Corporation, filed for tax year 2007, claimed that it was not described in section 883(c)(1) and that therefore it was entitled under section 883(a)(1) to exclude from gross income and exempt from U.S. taxation certain income. The taxpayer made this claim even though the regulations under section 883 (as applicable for the tax year 2007)—referred to as the “bearer share regulations”—precluded a foreign corporation the shares of which were issued in bearer form from taking these shares into account in establishing the ownership of the stock of the foreign corporation for purposes of determining whether the foreign corporation was described in section 883(c)(1) and thus whether it was entitled to the benefits of section 883(a)(1).
The taxpayer asserted that the bearer share regulations were invalid. The Tax Court, however, found that the 2003 regulations were valid under the two-step analysis under Chevron.
The D.C. Circuit today reversed the Tax Court, finding that the IRS had not justified treating all bearer shares as incapable of proving ownership and thus that the 2003 regulations (as then in effect) were unreasonable and invalid.
© 2019 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”) is a Swiss entity.
Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.