OECD: BEPS inclusive framework members | KPMG | GLOBAL
Share with your friends

OECD: Review of 11 preferential regimes, BEPS inclusive framework members

OECD: BEPS inclusive framework members

The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) today issued a release that updates the results of preferential regime reviews conducted by the “Forum on Harmful Tax Practices” (FHTP) in connection with Action 5* under the base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) project.


Related content

*BEPS Action 5, Countering harmful tax practices more effectively, taking into account transparency and substance

Today’s OECD release lists the following updates:

  • Four new regimes were designed to comply with FHTP standards—meeting all aspects of transparency, exchange of information, ring fencing and substantial activities—and were found to be not harmful (Lithuania, Luxembourg, Singapore, Slovak Republic).
  • Four regimes were repealed or amended to remove harmful features (Chile, Malaysia, Turkey and Uruguay). 
  • Three regimes were found not to relate to geographically mobile income and/or were not concerned with business taxation, and as such posed no BEPS Action 5 risks and were found to be “out of scope” (Kenya and two Vietnam regimes).

Eleven new preferential regimes were identified since the last update, bringing the total to 175 regimes in over 50 jurisdictions considered by the FHTP since the creation of the inclusive framework. Of the 175 regimes: 31 have been changed; 81 require legislative changes (in progress); 47 have been determined to not pose a BEPS risk; four have harmful or potentially harmful features; and 12 are still under review.

The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.

Connect with us


Request for proposal