OECD: MAP statistics for 2016 - KPMG Global
Share with your friends

OECD: Mutual agreement procedure (MAP) statistics for 2016

OECD: MAP statistics for 2016

The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) today released mutual agreement procedure (MAP) statistics for 2016.


Related content

The MAP statistics for the 2016 reporting period reveal:

  • In comparison with the 2015 MAP statistics, both the number of MAP cases in start inventory and the number of started MAP cases have increased, resulting from both an increase in the number of reporting jurisdictions and modified counting rules.
  • Approximately 8,000 cases were in the inventory of the reporting jurisdictions as of 1 January 2016 and almost 25% were closed during 2016.
  • Almost 1,500 cases started on or after 1 January 2016, and approximately 25% of them were already closed in 2016.
  • Transfer pricing cases account for slightly more than half of the MAP cases in inventory.
  • Transfer pricing cases take more time on average than other cases—approximately 30 months are needed for transfer pricing cases and 17 months for other cases.
  • Over 85% of MAPs concluded in 2016 resolved the issue. Almost 60% of MAP cases closed were resolved with an agreement fully resolving the taxation not in accordance with the tax treaty and almost 20% of them were granted a unilateral relief while almost 5% were resolved via domestic remedy. Finally, 5% of the MAP cases closed were withdrawn by taxpayers while approximately 10% were not resolved for various reasons.


The agreed reporting framework reflects a collaborative approach for cases started as from 1 January 2016, which is the date when the reporting jurisdictions committed to implement the base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) Action 14 minimum standard.

  • The agreed reporting framework provides common definitions (MAP case, start date, end date, outcomes) that are now used for counting MAP cases and computing the average time needed to close MAP cases.
  • Each jurisdiction reports MAP statistics per treaty partner or per category of treaty partners, and each case initiated as from 1 January 2016 in a given jurisdiction now appears in the MAP statistics of the treaty partner that is involved as well, which enables identification of the cases that are reported by two different jurisdictions at the same time and avoids double counting of these cases.
  • The MAP statistics also show the types of cases concerned (transfer pricing or other cases) and the outcomes reached, classified in ten categories.

The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.

Connect with us


Want to do business with KPMG?


Request for proposal