Following approval by the European Code of Conduct group, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) also concluded that the Dutch innovation box regime does not produce any harmful tax competition.
Since July 2016, the OECD Forum on Harmful Tax Practices has investigated 125 preferential tax regimes in various countries. The OECD forum, in a report produced following 12 months of evaluation, concluded that the innovation box regimes of 11 countries—including the Netherlands—did not produce any harmful tax competition. The OECD forum approval relates to a version of the innovation box that (for the most part) was introduced as of 1 January 2017, and was included in the 2017 Tax Plan.
These confirmations from the European Code of Conduct Group and the OECD Forum on Harmful Tax Practices that the Dutch innovation box is internationally acceptable, do not make any statement about potential EU state aid. In 2014, the European Commission announced that as part of its state aid investigation into the ruling practices of EU Member States, it would also investigate preferential regimes for income from patents and innovation. In light of the above approvals, it seems likely that, for the purposes of this state aid investigation, the Dutch innovation box regime may no longer be regarded a priority for EU state aid. However, the European Commission is expected to continue to monitor the possible presence of prohibited state aid in individual cases. This could, for example, occur if a tax ruling of the Dutch tax authorities grants a benefit to the taxpayer based on an overly broad application of legislation and regulations.
Read a July 2017 report prepared by the KPMG member firm in the Netherlands
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.