Foresight – Brazil’s pragmatic new infrastructure program
Brazil’s pragmatic new infrastructure program
With 34 infrastructure concessions and privatization programs, Brazil’s government hopes to attract private investors.
With the announcement of 34 infrastructure concessions and privatization programs, Brazil’s government hopes to kick-start its flagging economy and attract cautious private investors.
Anyone visiting Brazil cannot fail to notice the creaking state of its airports, roads, rail, power and water facilities. Despite the recent investments for the World Cup and Olympics, the World Economic Forum still ranks the country 120 out of 144 for the quality of its infrastructure. A large budget deficit restricts the government’s ability to fund improvements, while concerns over corruption, political stability, and a history of curtailed projects, along with high borrowing costs have deterred investors.
Amidst this uncertain atmosphere, President Michel Temer’s 13 September 2016 announcement of a package of infrastructure concessions and privatization programs offers both hope and caution. Hope, because the details of the programs suggest that the administration is building on past learnings to try to create a robust, transparent, level playing field for investors. Caution, because the full details are yet to be revealed, including how these projects will be financed.
Laying the groundwork for successful projects
The projects include concessions for logistics infrastructure (airports, ports, highways, and rail), mining, plus the privatization of sanitation companies along with assets in the power sector. There will also be auctions in oil and gas (please see chart).. In all, there are just 34 projects – far less than in earlier years. Total investments for these various projects is forecast to exceed 12 billion US dollars (US$). This is encouraging news, given that many previous infrastructure programs failed to deliver, so a more modest objective should increase the chances of getting most or all the projects over the finish line.
A considerable amount of thought has gone into how best to develop infrastructure projects. One notable change is the creation of a new body called The Investment Partnership Program (Programa de Parcerias de Investimentos, or “PPI”), which will be responsible for the project governance and delivery. PPI is part of the President’s office, reflecting the high priority the administration attaches to infrastructure.
Having a single body should bring much-needed clarity and accountability to project planning and delivery, replacing the previously complex arrangement featuring multiple agencies including regulators, ministries and the national audit office.
There have been a number of changes to the tender process itself, to maximize the chance of a successful outcome and widen the field of bidders. Projects will need to have detailed business cases before going to tender, which brings much-needed assurance to potential bidders and moves Brazil closer to international best practice.
A major infrastructure project is no small undertaking, yet past Brazilian tenders were often rushed affairs that left insufficient time to study the details and prepare a robust proposal. As a consequence, many interested parties either held back from making a bid, or prepared a proposal based on very preliminary information, in some cases leading to project failure. To overcome this barrier, the minimum time period between tenders and auctions has been increased to 100 days (potentially going to 180 days), allowing more time to analyze the project, carry out due diligence and prepare for a bid.
One factor that frequently held up progress was the delay in obtaining environmental licenses; in future this will be a pre-requisite before bidding begins. And, with foreign, non-Portuguese speakers in mind, key parts of the tender documents are now to be available in English, which indicates that the Government is committed to attract bids from overseas.
Historically, financing for Brazilian infrastructure projects has been via public sector banks, in particular the national development bank BNDES, which lent the full funds at a government-subsidized rate. The precarious state of the country’s finances, brought about by negative gross national product (GDP) growth, has made such a practice unsustainable.
But with interest rates still high, investors require some incentive to choose infrastructure (a relatively risky vehicle) over the safer option of government bonds. Brazil’s government has responded by offering more attractive rates of returns and funding of up to US$9 billion, 5.5 billion of which will come from the BNDES (as well as Banco do Brasil and Caixa Economica Federal) and 3.5 billion from the Workers Compensation Fund (FGTS). These entities will purchase debentures from the winning concession holders.
In the longer-term, the government wants to diversify its sources of financing. If and when interest rates start to come down, the role of BNDES should be scaled back to a degree comparable to other national development banks, certainly not of a sole financier.
The devil is in the detail
Despite the government’s best efforts to make Brazil an attractive destination for infrastructure investors, several challenges remain. Not least is the continued fallout from the “car wash” investigation.
Some projects are expected to be prone to delays, with public sector officials understandably hesitant to progress projects that might come under the radar of corruption probes – and could leave responsible individuals personally exposed to possible investigations and legal action. The desire to root out corruption could also see greater vigilance from prosecutors and the judiciary, making officials even more risk-averse. All these pressures mean a higher degree of due diligence over bids, to avoid the threat of legal action.
In spite of these obstacles, the majority of the 34 concessions are expected to be awarded by the end of President Temer’s term in 2018.
Brazil’s PPI program is at an early stage, with the final concession and privatization models, and the wider procurement process, yet to be fully defined. As always, the devil is in the detail, and interested investors would be wise to follow developments closely, to give themselves the best possible chance of making a robust, competitive bid. The coming months should see some changes to legislation and regulations, with a strengthening of regulatory agencies and a new framework for issuing environmental licenses.
Infrastructure is key to the rejuvenation of the Brazilian economy. If successful, this modest, pragmatic program could restore faith in the country’s ability to deliver major projects, and open the door to a renewed surge of foreign investment that could further boost economic growth prospects.
The programs at a glance
|Program||Timeline for bid||Timeline for auction|
|Four airports concessions: Porto Alegre, Salvador, Florianópolis and Fortaleza||4th quarter of 2016||1st quarter of 2017|
|Two port terminals: Santarém and Rio de Janeiro||4th quarter of 2016||2nd quarter of 2017|
|Three railways: EF 151 SP/MG/GO/TO, EF 170 MT/PA and EF 334 BA||1st semester of 2017||2nd semester of 2017|
|Two highways: BR 364/365 GO/MG and BR 101/116/290/386 RS||2nd semester of 2017||2nd semester of 2017|
|Nine power distributors and hydro power plants||2nd semester of 2017||2nd semester of 2017|
|Three water and sewage companies||2nd semester of 2017||1st semester of 2018|
|Three bidding rounds of oil and gas||2nd semester of 2016||2nd semester of 2017|
|Assets of CPRM –Companhia de Pesquisae Recursos Minerais||1st semester of 2017||2nd semester of 2017|
- What is the likely impact of the heightened anti-corruption environment on the bidding process?
- How easy is it for foreign investors to navigate the regulatory landscape?
- Will project financing in Brazil get closer to international practice?
- When will interest rates drop to a level that opens up opportunities for private finance?
This article is part of the Foresight series; a collection of easy to read, short insights into trends and issues facing the infrastructure industry. Read other recent Foresight articles.