IFRS 4 amendments
IFRS 4 amendments
Amendments respond to industry concerns about the impact of differing effective dates.
Differing effective dates of IFRS 9 Financial Instruments and the new insurance contracts standard could have had a significant impact on insurers.
In response to concerns regarding temporary accounting mismatches and volatility, and increased costs and complexity, the International Accounting Standards Board (the Board) issued amendments to IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts in 2017.
The two optional solutions raised some considerations which required detailed analysis and management judgement.
On the issue of IFRS 17 (Revised) Insurance Contracts in June 2020, the end date for applying the two options under the IFRS 4 amendments was extended to 1 January 2023, aligned with the effective date of IFRS 17.
Two optional solutions
Temporary exemption from IFRS 9
- Rather than having to implement IFRS 9 in 2018, some companies are permitted to continue to apply IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement.
- To qualify, a reporting company’s activities need to be predominantly connected with insurance.
- This optional solution provides an overlay approach to presentation to alleviate temporary accounting mismatches and volatility.
- For designated financial assets, a company is permitted to reclassify between profit or loss and other comprehensive income (OCI), the difference between the amounts recognised in profit or loss under IFRS 9 and those that would have been reported under IAS 39.
Deciding how to best use the amendments
When deciding if and how to use the amendments, companies considered:
- the costs and benefits of the two optional solutions;
- the effectiveness of each solution in mitigating any costs arising from the differing effective dates;
- if and how their peers would use the amendments; and
- the expectations and reactions of investors and other users of the financial statements.
The impact of these amendments included the following:
- Judgement was needed to complete the predominance assessment. To qualify for the temporary exemption, management had to consider both qualitative and quantitative factors in determining whether the company meets the eligibility criteria.
- Applying the temporary exemption for companies within a group structure could have resulted in companies preparing financial reports under both IAS 39 and IFRS 9. If applicable, management considered the costs and complexities of these situations at the group and stand-alone reporting levels.
- Companies applying the overlay approach have to produce and track IAS 39 and IFRS 9 amounts in parallel for designated financial assets.
If you would like to discuss the IFRS 9 impacts on your business, please speak to your usual KPMG contact.
© 2022 KPMG IFRG Limited, a UK company, limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.