On December 2, 2015 the ECON Committee published the final version of its report entitled “Bringing transparency, coordination and convergence to Corporate Tax policies in the Union”.
On December 2, 2015 the European Parliament’s permanent Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON) Committee published the final version of its report entitled “Bringing transparency, coordination and convergence to Corporate Tax policies in the Union”. The final version, adopted by the Committee on December 1 deviates to some extent from the earlier draft (see ETF 263).
On the same day, December 2, the European Parliament (EP) also decided that the work of its Special Committee on Tax Rulings (TAXE Committee) should be continued under a new mandate for six months.
Following the recent public and political interest in advance tax ruling practices in Member States (MS), and especially the LuxLeaks scandal last year, the EP decided in December 2014 to launch the drafting of a legislative own-initiative report on Bringing transparency, coordination and convergence to Corporate Tax policies in the Union. The drafting of this report was assigned to the EP’s permanent ECON Committee.
Further to the assignment to its permanent ECON Committee, the EP decided in February 2015 to set up a Special Committee on Tax Rulings (TAXE Committee).
Although both committees were set up by the EP, there are differences in the powers each committee has. The key difference is that the ECON Committee has the power, through the EP’s legislative own-initiative procedure, to make the European Commission (EC) respond to its recommendations, whereas no such obligation follows from the TAXE Committee’s non-binding recommendations. If the recommendations are adopted by the EP as a whole, the EC is obliged to respond to the ECON Committee’s recommendations within three months by issuing a legislative proposal or giving an explanation for not doing so.
The ECON Committee report contains a number of recommendations to the EC on topics such as Country-by-Country Reporting, protection of whistleblowers and CCCTB. The recommendations are based on the work of the TAXE Committee and thus overlap to some extent with the matters covered in the latter’s report published on November 25, 2015 (see attached EU Tax Centre Announcement (PDF 303 KB)).
The final text is somewhat more extensive than the original report (see ETF 263). The main changes to the original report are:
On the basis of its preparatory work, the initial TAXE Committee published a report, including recommendations, on how to improve transparency and cooperation between MS in the field of corporate taxation. The report was adopted, in the form of a resolution, by the EP on November 25, 2015 (see attached EU Tax Centre Announcement (PDF 303 KB)).
After the end of its initial mandate, it was decided that the work of the TAXE Committee should be continued under a new mandate for six months. The decision was endorsed by the EP on December 2, 2015 by 561 votes to 69 with 5 abstentions. The structure of the TAXE II Committee will be the same as that of its predecessor, and it will build on the work done previously, in particular on the said parliamentary resolution. Additionally, the new committee will also follow up on ongoing work by international institutions, including the OECD and G20.
The ECON Committee’s report will be put to a vote by the EP on December 16, 2015. If it is approved, the Commission has to respond to the recommendations within three months (as explained above).
The TAXE II Committee will continue the TAXE Committee’s work, focusing on harmful corporate tax regimes and practices at the European and international level on a continuous basis until the end of its mandate.
The assignments of two different parliamentary committees in the field of corporate taxation, the extension of the TAXE Committee’s mandate (as TAXE II Committee), as well as the detailed additions made to the original ECON Committee’s report reflect the increasing pressure the EP is putting on other European institutions with regard to countering aggressive tax planning and promoting tax transparency. The legislative own-initiative procedure remains the most effective tool for the EP in this regard, as it now has the possibility to force the EC to react to its recommendations by adopting the final ECON Committee report in its upcoming plenary session.
Should you require further assistance in this matter, please contact the EU Tax Centre or, as appropriate, your local KPMG tax advisor.
Chairman, KPMG’s EU Tax Centre and Partner, Meijburg & Co
Director EU Tax Services, KPMG’s EU Tax Centre and Director, Meijburg & Co