Poland: Tax proceedings initiated to suspend limitations period; identifying rental and lease revenue
Efforts by the tax authorities to suspend the running of the limitations period and concerning the tax treatment of rental and leasing revenue
Efforts by the tax authorities to suspend the running of the limitations period
A bench of seven judges of the Polish Supreme Administrative Court issued two “resolutions” concerning efforts by the tax authorities to suspend the running of the limitations period and concerning the tax treatment of rental and leasing revenue.
- The first resolution (case file I FPS 1/21) addresses whether administrative courts are allowed to examine the actions of the tax authorities when penal tax proceedings have been initiated by the tax authorities when such proceedings have a sole purpose of suspending the statute of limitations. The Supreme Administrative Court confirmed that in determining whether the effect of suspending the limitation period for a tax liability is to be allowed, an administrative court must verify the initiation of fiscal penal proceedings is not artificial and does not serve only to suspend the limitations period. In other words, a court that is considering a taxpayer’s appeals against the tax authorities’ actions in such instances must determine whether the initiation of fiscal penal proceedings is aimed primarily at suspending the limitations period for the tax liability, and if found, then the court must disallow this action and allow the limitations period to expire.
The resolution of the Supreme Administrative Court concerning the limitations period is important to all taxpayers against whom tax proceedings have been brought when because of the approaching limitation period for the tax liability subject to the proceedings, the tax authorities also launched penal tax proceedings. If the court finds that the initiation of such penal tax proceedings was aimed solely at suspending the limitations period, then the court is to reject the action by the tax authorities and discontinue the tax proceedings against the taxpayer because of the expiration of the limitations period.
- The second one (case file II FPS 1/21) relates to the method for identifying revenue from the letting (renting), leasing, and other contracts of similar type involving assets not used by taxpayers in their business activities to the correct source of revenue for individual (personal) income tax purposes. According to the court, it was up to the taxpayer to decide whether the rental or leased property was part of the personal property or the business assets (by entering this asset into the fixed asset register) and this is decisive for choosing the applicable principles of taxation of revenues on this account.
Read a May 2021 report [PDF 309 KB] prepared by the KPMG member firm in Poland
The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organization. KPMG International Limited is a private English company limited by guarantee and does not provide services to clients. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.