Israel: Characterization of intragroup recharges for stock-based compensation
Israel: Characterization of intragroup recharges
Israel’s tax administration on 27 January 2021 released a tax circular as guidance intended to clarify the characterization of intragroup recharges for stock-based compensation from a tax perspective.
Many companies provide their employees with various forms of stock-based compensation that is often based on the equity of the group’s parent entity (or other listed entity in the group). In many cases, the group will implement a “recharge agreement” whereby the local subsidiary will reimburse the parent for the cost of its equity compensation.
In Israel, based on the local tax treatment of stock-based compensation expenses, recharges can be a material factor regarding the potential deductibility of stock-based compensation expenses for corporate tax purposes.
Recharges have also become more common following a 2018 High Court decision (Kontera Technologies Ltd. v. TA 3 Assessing Officer) that mandated the inclusion of the stock-based compensation expenses (per local GAAP) in the application of a cost-plus mechanism for related-party services, regardless of their eventual deductibility.
In recent years, the Israeli tax administration has placed a greater focus on recharge payments and the possibility that, in some cases, these payments may be classified as deemed dividends subject to withholding tax.
Circular 1/2021 details a number of criteria according to which intragroup recharges may be regarded as compensation (and not deemed dividends) including:
- A classification as compensation will be allowed up to the level of the expense incurred for local GAAP purposes.
- The recharge can be only be for equity grants that have already vested.
- The recharge must be based on an intercompany agreement that was in place prior to the stock-based compensation grant and should be tied to the GAAP expense.
- A classification of a repayment will be allowed only if the associated expense was included in the transfer pricing mechanism (if incurred in the context of related-party activity).
- A recharge that does not meet these criteria will be deemed a dividend and subject to withholding tax—even if the recharge is to a group entity other than the ultimate parent (the circular is silent regarding how to determine what is the relevant jurisdiction for purposes of the withholding tax rate).
For more information, contact a tax professional with KPMG’s Global Transfer Pricing Services practice in Israel:
David Samson | +(972) 3.684.8970 | email@example.com
Itay Falb | +(972) 3.684.8000 | firstname.lastname@example.org
The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organization. KPMG International Limited is a private English company limited by guarantee and does not provide services to clients. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.