The Ministry of Finance issued two general rulings concerning the individual (personal) income tax implications of the use of company cars for private purposes and regarding application of the 50% tax-deductible costs to income from royalties.
According to the Ministry of Finance ruling, the costs related to maintenance and general use of a vehicle, borne by the employer that makes the vehicle available to the employee for their private use, are to be classified as “flat-rate income.” The Ministry of Finance supported the uniform approach expressed by administrative courts, by which the flat-rate value of the car fringe benefit covers the costs related to the maintenance and general use of the vehicle, such as fuel, insurance, tire replacement, and current repairs or periodic inspections, which the employer, as the vehicle's owner, must incur to keep the car operational and authorised to participate in road traffic. However, certain additional charges, such as parking fees or highway tolls, are not to be treated as benefit-derived amounts covered by the flat-rate revenue.
The second ruling provides conditions that are to be satisfied in order to apply the 50% tax-deductible costs to revenue earned on account of exercising and disposing of copyrights or related rights under an employment contract or other civil law contract. To treat part of the remuneration as a royalty and available for the 50% deduction, the following requirements must be satisfied:
The ruling does not specify the method of determining the amount of the royalty due, and leaves the contractual freedom to the parties, citing only “negative” case-law derived premises for excluding the possibility of applying 50% tax-deductible costs by authors. Furthermore, the ruling notes the requirement that there must be proper documentation of the revenue earned from copyright and related rights and/or disposing of the rights, along with the amount. In principle, the method of establishing the documentation is arbitrary. For instance, it may take form of records or a joint statement of parties to the contract. Additionally, according to the ruling, the royalty for a given work may also be paid out, in whole or in part, before the work is created (e.g., on the date of signing the contract).
Read a September 2020 report [PDF 228 KB] prepared by the KPMG member firm in Poland
The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organization. KPMG International Limited is a private English company limited by guarantee and does not provide services to clients. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.