The U.S. Tax Court today held that the transfers of parcels of real estate by a real estate developer to liquidating trusts (for the benefit of mortgage holders) did not have the effect of producing the losses claimed for the years because there were no bona fide dispositions or completed transactions regarding the property transfers to the liquidating trusts.
The case is: Sage v. Commissioner, 154 T.C. No. 12 (June 2, 2020). Read the Tax Court’s opinion [PDF 132 KB]
The taxpayer (a real estate developer) owned through a subchapter S corporation, three parcels of real estate in Oregon that were encumbered by liabilities in excess of their fair market values. In response to the 2008 economic recession, the S corporation in December 2009 engaged in a series of transactions designed to transfer the parcels to three separate liquidating trusts for the benefit of the mortgage holders. These were unilateral transactions in which the properties were placed in the trusts without any involvement from the beneficiaries.
Between 2010 and 2012, the liquidating trusts disposed of the parcels, and the mortgage holders applied the proceeds from these dispositions against the outstanding liabilities of the S corporation and its wholly owned limited liability company (LLC).
The S corporation reported significant losses as a result of the 2009 transactions—losses that the taxpayer claimed on his 2009 individual tax return. These losses gave rise to a net operating loss (NOL), which the taxpayer carried back to his 2006 tax year as an NOL carryback deduction and carried forward to his 2012 tax year as an NOL carryover deduction.
The IRS disallowed the losses reported by the S corporation and claimed by the taxpayer for the 2009 tax year; made correlative adjustments to the 2006 and 2012 NOL deductions; and determined deficiencies for 2006 and 2012. The taxpayer timely filed a petition with the Tax Court.
Today, the Tax Court held the NOL deductions were properly disallowed, finding that:
The Tax Court sustained the deficiencies and also the assessment of an accuracy-related penalty under section 6662 for 2012.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.