U.S. Supreme Court denies certiorari, appeal from Ninth Circuit upholding cost-sharing regulations as valid
U.S. Supreme Court denies certiorari
The U.S. Supreme Court today denied a taxpayer’s petition for certiorari in an appeal from the Ninth Circuit that in 2019 had upheld as valid Treasury regulations requiring the sharing of stock-based compensation (SBC) costs between parties in a qualified cost-sharing arrangement (QCSA).
The case is: Altera Corp. v. Commissioner, Docket no. 19-1009 (cert. denied June 22, 2020). Read the Court’s orders page [PDF 133 KB]
The U.S. Tax Court in 2015 found Treasury regulations under section 482—specifically, Reg. section 1.482-7A(d)(2) that requires participants in a QCSA to share the cost of employee stock-based compensation—were invalid. The Ninth Circuit in 2019 reversed the Tax Court’s 2015 opinion, and upheld the Treasury regulations as valid. Read TaxNewsFlash
Today, the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari. This leaves intact the Ninth Circuit’s decision that upheld the Treasury regulations, but the Tax Court’s unanimous opinion [PDF 121 KB] remains as a valid authority outside the Ninth Circuit.
The denial of certiorari raises many issues for taxpayers both within and outside the Ninth Circuit. Importantly, taxpayers must determine whether a filing position exists for a position that the regulations at issue are invalid, and address the accounting implications of any such position under Accounting Standards Codification 740. Other issues include how to make contractually mandated reverse clawback payments to share SBC costs from prior years, and how the requirement to share SBC costs affects the valuation of platform contribution transactions that were determined based on forecasts that excluded SBC costs.
Read a June 2020 report* [PDF 329 KB] prepared by KPMG LLP
*Reprinted with permission of the publisher
The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organization. KPMG International Limited is a private English company limited by guarantee and does not provide services to clients. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.