The Court of Justice for the European Union (CJEU) today issued a judgment finding that pensioners in the private and public sectors may be subject to different national tax regimes, and that the Italian tax treatment stemming from the Italy-Portugal income tax treaty does not infringe the principles of freedom of movement and non-discrimination.
The cases are: HB v. Istituto Nazionale della Previdenza Sociale (C-168-19) and IC v. Istituto Nazionale della Previdenza Sociale (C-169/19) (30 April 2020)
As explained by a release [PDF 152 KB] from the CJEU, individuals HB and IC (both of Italian nationality) are former Italian public sector employees receiving a retirement pension from the INPS (Italy’s social security system).
After transferring their residence to Portugal, they requested from the INPS, in 2015, that they receive, pursuant to the Italy-Portugal income tax treaty, the gross amount of their pension without deduction (withholding) of tax at source by Italy, so as to be able to benefit from the tax advantages offered by Portugal. The INPS rejected those requests, taking the view that those rules apply only to Italian private-sector pensioners who have transferred their residence to Portugal and to Italian public-sector pensioners who, in addition to having transferred their residence to Portugal, have acquired Portuguese nationality (a condition which HB and IC did not meet).
HB and IC then brought actions before an Italian regional court that, in turn, asked the CJEU whether the Italian tax system (flowing from the treaty provisions) constitutes an obstacle to the freedom of movement of Italian public sector pensioners and discrimination on grounds of nationality.
By today’s judgment, the CJEU answers both questions in the negative.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.