The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit today concluded that an administrative request for refunds of interest paid on a “large corporate tax underpayment” had not been timely filed, and thus denied the taxpayer’s refund action.
The Federal Circuit affirmed a dismissal of the action by the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, that the taxpayer had not filed its administrative refund claims with the IRS within the six-month limitations period under section 6230(c).
The case is: General Mills, Inc. v. United States, 2019-1124 (Fed. Cir. April 23, 2020). Read the Federal Circuit’s decision [PDF 284 KB] that includes a dissenting opinion.
The taxpayer was seeking refunds of interest it paid on corporate income tax underpayments that the IRS assessed at the enhanced rate of interest for “large corporate underpayments” under section 6621(c).
The taxpayer—the parent corporation of a number of partners of a limited liability company that is treated as a partnership for tax purposes—alleged that after certain partnership-level audits for the 2002–2006 tax years were settled with the IRS, the IRS erroneously collected approximately $6 million in interest by selecting incorrect “applicable dates” to start the running of interest at the higher large corporate underpayment rate.
The taxpayer paid the interest in April 2011, and in March 2013, filed administrative refund claims with the IRS. The IRS denied the claims for interest refunds.
The taxpayer filed suit for a refund in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, which dismissed the suit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, on finding that the taxpayer failed to file its administrative refund claims with the IRS within the six-month limitations period set forth in section 6230(c).
The taxpayer appealed, contending that the general two-year tax refund claim limitations period under section 6511(a) applied—and not the special six-month limitations period in section 6230(c).
The Federal Circuit today affirmed the lower court’s dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. As the Federal Circuit explained:
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.