The 2020 tax reform includes measures disallowing deductions of payments made to related parties in low-tax jurisdictions and limiting certain interest deductions. These measures have an effective date of 1 January 2020.
The 2020 tax reform was part of the 2020 economic legislative package, presented to the Mexican Congress in September 2019. Read TaxNewsFlash
The “anti-tax haven provision” establishes that payments made directly or indirectly to related parties subject to “low taxation” or through a structured agreement are not deductible for Mexican corporate income tax purposes.
For these purposes, according to Mexico’s income tax law, “low-tax jurisdictions” are those that provide for income taxation that is lower than 75% of the tax rate that would be payable in Mexico (30% for legal entities) regarding the same transaction (that is, 22.5% over same taxable income). Moreover, Mexico’s income tax law also establishes that a “structured agreement” is any agreement in which a Mexican taxpayer or any related-party participates, and the amount paid is linked to payments made to parties located in jurisdictions having a preferential tax regime that benefits the Mexican taxpayer or any related party, or when it may be concluded that such agreement was executed for such purposes, based on the facts and circumstances.
Considering these rules, it is important to keep in mind that this treatment would apply for Mexican corporate income tax purposes, to all deductible payments made for raw materials, inventories, interests, royalties, technical assistance, services, etc.
Regulations providing guidance to clarify the scope and application of these rules are expected to be issued by the Mexican tax authorities.
Application of rules to indirect payments
Concerning “indirect payments” made to parties in jurisdictions having preferential tax regimes, the Mexican rules also apply even when the payments are made to related parties that are not considered to be “low taxed” from Mexican tax perspectives when the final beneficiary of the payments is another related party that actually is located in a low-tax jurisdiction (as determined under the Mexican tax law).
For these purposes, there is a presumption that payments are made indirectly to a tax haven jurisdiction when the second payment (i.e., the one made to a low-tax jurisdiction) is deducted for tax purposes and is equal to or greater than 20% of the first payment made from the Mexican source (by the Mexican taxpayer). In this case, an amount equivalent to the deductible payment made by the ultimate recipient is considered to be income subject to a preferential tax regime and is not deductible for Mexican income tax purposes.
This treatment will apply to payments made between companies of the same corporate group and also will apply to payments made through structured agreements. According to provisions of Mexican income tax law, two members of a corporate group are considered to be within the same group whenever one of them holds effective control over the other or whenever a third party holds effective control over both. In this situation of indirect payment, the non-deductible amount for Mexican tax purposes is equal to the total amount paid by the direct recipient to the second related party located in the low-tax jurisdiction.
However, it is important to note that the corresponding payment will be considered to be deductible as long as the recipient (in a low-tax jurisdiction) obtains income from entrepreneurial activities (business activities). In this sense, the foreign resident must prove that it has the requisite personnel and assets to carry out its business activities, as well as it must demonstrate that it was incorporated and has its effective place of business (management) located in a country that has in force a broad tax exchange-of-information agreement with Mexico (referred to as the “substance test”).
Finally, regarding the payments made to low-tax jurisdictions, there are the exceptions in the application of the rule:
Note that even while this rule appears to be aligned with the OECD’s base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) Action 2 recommendations and BEPS Pillar 2, there are significant differences between Mexico’s treatment and that of the BEPS items, and multinational groups need to consider further analyzing these differences—with inquiry to whether this analysis is appropriate at the entity level or by each transaction.
As part of the 2020 tax reform amendments to Mexico’s income tax law, an interest expense deduction limitation was enacted and provides a year´s net interest is only deductible up to an amount equal to 30% of the adjusted tax profit.
In this regard, this provision is only applicable for taxpayers having accrued interest from their debts that exceeds $20 million pesos. This threshold is determined considering all interest accruals of all entities and permanent establishments of foreign residents that are members of the same group or that are related parties.
Interest related to certain debts are excluded from this interest deduction limitation provision:
The interest deduction limitation provision will not apply to members of the financial system engaged in these operations as part of its business purpose.
The rules allow a taxpayer to determine application of the deductible interest limitation on a consolidated basis (applicable for companies within to the same group).
Even in instances when the taxpayer does not realize a taxable profit, or when a tax loss is recognized, the adjusted tax profit must be determined for purposes of these rules. Moreover, even when the adjusted tax profit result is equal to zero or a negative number, the total amount of payable interest can be non-deductible.
The amount resulting from the calculation will have to be reduced, that is subtracted, from the net interest amount in order to determine the non-deductible amount. In this regard, in the event that a part of such interest cannot be deducted in the corresponding tax year, it may be carried forward and deducted over the following 10 years.
This provision will only apply when the non-deductible interest amounts, as determined under this provision, are greater than those determined according to the thin capitalization provision. There may be other tax implications arising from the computation of corporate income tax and value added tax provisions, and may require further analysis as a consequence of applying this new limitation on interest deduction provision.
For more information, contact a tax professional with the KPMG member firm in Mexico:
Armando Lara Yaffar | +52 (55) 5246 8374 | firstname.lastname@example.org
Alfredo Cobix | +52 (55) 5246 8727 | email@example.com
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.