close
Share with your friends

New Zealand: Purchase price allocation proposals for vendors, purchasers

New Zealand: Purchase price allocation proposals

Inland Revenue released an official issues paper concerning purchase price allocations.

1000

Related content

In the issues paper—Purchase Price Allocation: An officials issues paper [PDF 366 KB]—Inland Revenue expressed a concern that vendors and purchasers can take different positions on the value of assets sold, thereby creating a potential for tax “mis-matches” because the vendor’s valuation may result in less taxable income being returned, while the purchaser’s valuation may result in a higher depreciation base or deductions.

The issues paper proposes as a solution that the parties would agree to the allocation of the purchase price to the various items sold (based on market values). If they agree, the parties then would use the agreed values in their tax returns. However, if the parties do not agree, the vendor would able to choose the allocation and would need to notify the purchaser and Inland Revenue. If the vendor does not do these steps, the purchaser could allocate the purchase price (and must notify the vendor and Inland Revenue). Both parties would be required to use the chosen allocation.

Past commercial practice has been for parties to agree on the transaction—what is being sold and for how much. Each party then considers how the purchase price is to be allocated to different items. Most commonly, for a sale of land and buildings, the purchaser allocates the price to depreciable items such as fixtures and fittings and plant, rather than to non-depreciable buildings and land. 


KPMG observation

Tax professionals have observed that the proposals in the issues paper effectively "outsource" Inland Revenue's review of purchase price allocations to the parties. The issues paper proposes that Inland Revenue would retain the ability to dispute the purchase price allocation, if it considers the allocation to not be market-value based or is otherwise inappropriate.


Read a December 2019 report prepared by the KPMG member firm in New Zealand

The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.

Connect with us

 

Want to do business with KPMG?

 

loading image Request for proposal