Inland Revenue has “refreshed” a document that focuses on tax compliance by multinational enterprises (MNEs).
The Inland Revenue document—Multinational Enterprises Compliance Focus (2019) [PDF 919 KB]—focuses on the base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) measures implemented since the previous version of the document (2016) was released, and explains how compliance with these measures will be monitored and enforced to determine that MNEs pay their “fair share” of New Zealand tax.
In general, Inland Revenue’s stated compliance approach is to encourage a “right from the start” approach by working co-operatively with MNEs when possible.
BEPS, a key focus
New Zealand’s implementation of BEPS measures have, to date, included:
There is a new BEPS disclosure form and guidance (available on the Inland Revenue’s website) accompanying these developments. The BEPS disclosure form will need to be completed with the 2019 tax returns having June to September balance dates and for the 2020 tax return for all others.
The BEPS disclosure requirement has received little publicity, only a single mention in the document. Taxpayers must disclose the implications of the BEPS changes on their tax calculations, and need to consider all of these implications well in advance of a tax position being taken. Affected taxpayers need to determine that their supporting documentation is in order and up to date. Inland Revenue will be reviewing taxpayers filings when the BEPS disclosures made are not aligned with their expectations, and these taxpayers can expect more detailed questions and risk activity as a result.
Dual residence risk
The ongoing risk of dual (Australian and New Zealand) tax residence for companies receives a brief mention in the document. Inland Revenue has suggested that strategic management of any New Zealand subsidiaries be undertaken locally, to avoid adverse tax consequences.
Some believe that this suggestion may be impractical given the commercial realities of how trans-Tasman businesses operate.
Transfer pricing simplification
The Inland Revenue’s document notes some simplification to transfer pricing requirements, including “safe harbours” for:
Tax professionals note that while these measures are useful, they are mainly aimed at small and medium enterprises. For larger businesses (or those with complex cross-border transactions), contemporaneous benchmarking and documentation would need to be a focus. A “set and forget” attitude to transfer pricing is viewed as being highly risky in the current BEPS environment.
The importance of tax governance coming from the top-down is emphasized in the Inland Revenue’s document, and a checklist for boards of directors is provided. Ultimately, responsibility for the company’s tax strategy and how it is implemented sits with the board.
Read a November 2019 report prepared by the KPMG member firm in New Zealand
The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organization. KPMG International Limited is a private English company limited by guarantee and does not provide services to clients. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.