State tax authorities and courts continue to address remote sales-related issues arising after the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in “South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc.”
In Wayfair, the U.S. Supreme Court overruled the physical presence nexus standard of Quill and National Bellas Hess with respect to state and local taxation of remote sales. States have taken action, issued guidance or instituted other measures concerning nexus issues and collection of taxes on remote sales.
The Department of Revenue rescinded Transaction Privilege Tax Ruling 16-1 in light of Arizona’s new marketplace facilitator law (effective date of October 1, 2019). In the ruling, the Department had ruled that an online marketplace was considered a retailer when it was the “contact point for customer service, processing payments on behalf of the merchant and providing or controlling the fulfillment process.”
With the new law imposing a collection and remittance obligation on marketplace facilitators, the tax ruling no longer reflects the Department’s policy.
The Department of Taxation released guidance [PDF 158 KB] on the general excise tax responsibilities of marketplace facilitators.
In Hawaii, a 2019 tax law (Act 2 that has an effective date of January 1, 2020) defines a marketplace facilitator as any person who sells or assists in the sale tangible personal property, intangible property, and services by providing a forum for listing or advertising items for sale and by collecting payment from the purchaser, either directly or indirectly. Certain entities—including food delivery services, transportation network companies, task-based service platforms, and data access marketplaces—are specifically identified in the Department’s guidance as marketplace facilitators. The guidance also has an extensive discussion about the treatment and classification of marketplaces and entities involved in facilitating sales of travel and tourism-related services. A marketplace facilitator is considered to be engaged in business in Hawaii if it has more than $100,000 in annual receipts or 200 transactions in Hawaii.
A taxpayer (a company with a “dot-com” address) argued in a case before the Louisiana Supreme Court that it was not a “dealer” required to collect local Jefferson Parish sales tax on third-party sales made through its marketplace for pre-Wayfair tax periods. The lower court held that the definition of “dealer” encompasses a broader group of persons than a “seller.” In the court’s view, had the legislature intended the collection duty to apply only to sellers, it presumably would have used that defined term as opposed to “dealer.”
House Bills 4540, 4541, 4542, and 4543 were unanimously passed by the Michigan House and are now pending in the state Senate.
There is an expectation that the Senate would pass these bills and that the governor would sign them into law.
The state Senate passed Senate Bill 557, and the bill has been referred to the House. In addition to other tax changes, this bill would require marketplace facilitators that have either gross sales in excess of $100,000 or engage in 200 or more separate transactions into North Carolina annually to begin collecting and remitting sales taxes as of February 1, 2020.
The North Carolina budget bill contained similar provisions, but was vetoed by the governor earlier this year for other reasons.
An electronic marketplace filed a notice of appeal with the South Carolina Court of Appeals in response to a ruling of an administrative law judge that the entity was in the “business of selling” tangible personal property at retail because: (1) a customer’s interaction was almost entirely with the marketplace; and (2) the marketplace accepted money in exchange for products.
Read an October 2019 report prepared by KPMG LLP
The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organization. KPMG International Limited is a private English company limited by guarantee and does not provide services to clients. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.