The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) held that a value added tax (VAT) exemption for transactions involving payments and transfers related to the operation of automated teller machines (ATMs) do not qualify for the VAT exemption available for certain transactions concerning payments and transfers.
The case is: Cardpoint GmbH case (C-42/18, 3 October 2019)
The taxable person provides serviced related to the operation of ATMs owned by its client, a bank.
A German court initiated the reference for a preliminary judgment of the CJEU, specifically asking whether the services that the taxpayer provided for the operation of the ATMs qualify as “transactions concerning payments” that would be exempt from VAT under the VAT exemption for transactions concerning payments and transfers. However, according to a previous judgment, the CJEU has concluded that technical and administrative services provided by a service provider in connection with card payments for the sale of cinema tickets were not in scope of the VAT exemption).
The CJEU referred to its previous case law in which it concluded that services are regarded as “transactions concerning payments” if these services form a distinct whole, fulfilling in effect the specific and essential functions of a payment. The CJEU reiterated that a payment is characterized by the fact that such a transaction entails the transfer of money and a change in the legal and financial relationship between parties. In that respect, the CJEU noted that more than a mere physical or technical service must be provided.
Although the CJEU considered that the withdrawal of cash from an ATM must be regarded as a VAT-exempt “payment” and the services of the taxpayer were indispensable for the execution of these transfers, the CJEU concluded that these services could not be regarded as VAT-exempt “transactions concerning payments.” According to the CJEU, the services provided did not result in a cash transfer nor did they change the legal and financial relationship between parties—because the taxpayer does not debit and credit the relevant bank accounts (in fact, the taxpayer did not itself approve any transactions). After all, it has no authorization to do so, but transmitted, via a chain of intermediaries, data to the bank that issued the bank card used for the cash withdrawal. The taxpayer subsequently followed the instructions from that bank by providing the cash.
The CJEU also addressed the fact that supplying cash to the user of an ATM is not a transfer of ownership, but a transfer by the bank that issued the bank card and approved the cash withdrawal. It was the bank that operates the ATM that entered the data files in the banking system. According to the CJEU, this meant that it was the bank that made changes to the financial and legal relationship between parties. The taxpayer only sent the daily non-editable list with transactions for the purposes of notifying the central bank about the approved transactions performed. According to the CJEU, the registration of the withdrawal transactions did not display the essential functions which are characteristic of a payment.
Read an October 2019 report prepared by the KPMG member firm in the Netherlands
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.