The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit today vacated a judgment of a federal district court and transferred a taxpayer’s claim for overpayment interest on a delayed tax refund to the U.S. Court of Federal Claims.
The Second Circuit held that jurisdiction over the taxpayer’s claim for overpayment interest lies exclusively with the Court of Federal Claims. The case is: Pfizer, Inc. v. United States, No. 17-2307-cv (2d Cir. September 16, 2019). Read the Second Circuit’s decision [PDF 283 KB] that includes a concurring opinion.
The taxpayer’s income tax return for 2008 (filed September 11, 2009) showed a tax overpayment in excess of $769.6 million. The taxpayer asked the IRS to refund $500 million and to apply the remaining balance to its estimated tax for 2009. The IRS prepared refund checks, but the taxpayer never received them. The taxpayer contacted the IRS multiple times between December 2009 and February 2010 to inquire about the refund checks. The IRS eventually cancelled the checks, and on March 19, 2010, the IRS deposited the overpayment refund of approximately $500 million directly into the taxpayer’s bank account.
Three years later, the taxpayer filed a claim requesting interest on the tax overpayment. The IRS disallowed the interest claim, on the grounds that IRS records indicated that the refund checks were issued on October 19, 2009. The taxpayer first appealed with the IRS Office of Appeals and eventually filed suit in federal district court seeking about $8.3 million in overpayment interest. The government first moved to dismiss the district court action, or alternatively to transfer it to the Court of Federal Claims, for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Subsequently, the government moved to dismiss the district court action on the grounds that the taxpayer failed to file its claim within the two-year statute of limitations. The federal district court granted the government’s second motion to dismiss, and the taxpayer filed an appeal with the Second Circuit.
Today, the Second Circuit vacated the district court’s judgment and ordered the case transferred to the Court of Federal Claims. The Second Circuit explained that for a federal district court to have jurisdiction, the taxpayer’s claim for overpayment interest must be an action seeking recovery of: (1) an internal revenue tax alleged to have been erroneously or illegally assessed or collected; (2) a penalty claimed to have been collected without authority; or (3) a sum alleged to have been excessive or wrongfully collected. Because a claim for overpayment interest does not fall within one of these three categories, under the Tucker Act (28 U.S.C. section 1491(a)(1)), the Court of Federal Claims has exclusive jurisdiction over the taxpayer’s claim for overpayment interest.
The Second Circuit’s decision today conflicts with the Sixth Circuit’s decision in E.W. Scripps Co. v. United States, 420 F.3d 589 (6th Cir. 2005) and sets up a clear split between the Sixth Circuit and the Second Circuit as to whether federal district courts have jurisdiction to hear overpayment interest claims similar to the one in the instant case.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.