The European Commission today announced it has opened “separate” in-depth investigations of whether Belgium’s “excess profit” tax rulings granted to 39 multinational companies were in breach of the EU state aid rules.
Today’s action follows the EU General Court's annulment of the EC’s earlier finding that the same tax rulings formed part of a Belgian aid “scheme” that was illegal under EU state aid rules. Read KPMG’s Euro Tax Flash
In today’s release, the EC stated that the General Court:
Hence, the EC today announced it has opened separate in-depth investigations of the individual tax rulings granted to the 39 companies.
“Excess profits” tax rulings
The EC’s in-depth investigations concerned individual "excess profit" tax rulings issued by Belgium between 2005 and 2014 for 39 Belgian companies belonging to multinational groups. Most of these multinational groups are headquartered in Europe.
Belgian corporate tax rules require companies, as a starting point, to be taxed based on profit actually recorded from activities in Belgium. However, the Belgian "excess profit" tax rulings—relying on provisions of the Belgian income tax code (Article 185 §2, b of the Code des Impôts sur les Revenus/Wetboek Inkomstenbelastingen)—allowed multinational entities in Belgium to reduce their corporate tax liability by "excess profits" that allegedly result from the advantage of being part of a multinational group. These advantages included, for instance, synergies, economies of scale, reputation, client and supplier networks, or access to new markets. In practice, the EC found that the rulings typically resulted in more than 50% and in some cases up to 90% of those companies' accounting profit being exempt from taxation.
The EC's preliminary view was that by discounting “excess profit” from the beneficiaries' tax base, the tax rulings under investigation selectively misapplied the Belgian income tax code. In particular, the EC’s concerns have been that the rulings endorsed unilateral downward adjustments of the beneficiaries' tax base, although the legal conditions were not fulfilled.
The EC also has concerns that the Belgian practice of issuing “excess profit” rulings in favor of certain companies may have discriminated against certain other Belgian companies, which did not, or could not, receive such a ruling. As a result, the tax rulings may have given a selective advantage to the 39 multinational companies, allowing them to pay substantially less tax.
Read a September 2019 report prepared by KPMG’s EU Tax Centre
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.