The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) on 26 September 2019 released a draft compliance approach to transfer pricing issues related to projects that involve the use, in Australian waters, of non-resident owned mobile offshore drilling units (MODUs).
The draft compliance approach—PCG 2019/D5—would primarily affect Australian taxpayers that lease vessels from non-resident related parties under bareboat charter arrangements for drilling and drilling-related activities (such as pipe-laying and heavy-lift vessels) in Australian waters.
The implications of being in the different coloured zones broadly align to previous PCG’s issued by the ATO as follows:
The white zone
If an arrangement is in the white zone, the ATO has already reviewed the transaction and agreed to the transfer pricing outcomes, or agreed to an advance pricing arrangement (APA). If an arrangement is in the white zone, it will generally not be subject to further ATO review.
The green zone
To qualify for the green zone and be considered “low risk,” the profitability of the Australian operations compared to the total contract revenue of the Australian operations must be at least 10.5% for the relevant income year.
In determining the profitability of the Australian operations, taxpayers will need to consider the entirety of the drilling and associated activities of the operator in Australia—and this may mean combining the financial results of more than one entity. This could be a challenging exercise for some taxpayers.
An arrangement in the green zone will generally not be subject to ATO review or audit, and may qualify for a simplified transfer pricing recordkeeping concession.
Outside the green zone
Arrangements outside the green zone are more likely to be reviewed by the ATO as matter of priority. The ATO has also outlined in the draft PCG, the extensive information they will most likely request in a review or audit context that includes a significant level of detail from the vessel owner. Taxpayers with red zone arrangements need to determine that they have robust transfer pricing documentation in place to support the arm’s length nature of the arrangements.
Transitioning to the green zone
The ATO will consider imposing shortfall penalties at nil and shortfall interest charge at the base rate if certain pre-conditions are met (for a period of 12 months after publication of the PCG). In order to be eligible for this concession, taxpayers would be required to make a voluntary disclosure in relation to historic, current and prospective income years when the arrangements are in place and adjust to reflect an appropriate transfer pricing outcome.
Guidance from the ATO in relation to this issue has been long awaited and therefore will be welcomed on one level. Notwithstanding this, at first glance, the benchmark to qualify for the low-risk green zone appears high, particularly given the economic conditions affecting the oil and gas industry in recent years. It therefore remains to be seen how many taxpayers will find themselves in the green zone under the proposed arrangements.
The ATO has invited comments on the draft PCG by 25 October 2019. Taxpayers engaged in leasing arrangements covered by the draft PCG need to consider their leasing arrangements in light of the draft guidance. When an arrangement is outside of the green (low-risk) zone, taxpayers need to determine that they have robust transfer pricing documentation in place that supports an alternative outcome as being consistent with comparable arm's length outcomes or they may consider a voluntary disclosure.
For more information, contact a KPMG tax professional in Australia:
Michael Fortmann | +61 8 9263 7444 | firstname.lastname@example.org
Nick Warth | +61 8 9263 7731 | email@example.com
Kobus Meyburgh | +61 8 9263 4835 | firstname.lastname@example.org
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.