{{vm.title}}
25{{vm.includesText}}
{{item}}
{{vm.selectText}}
{{ vm.welcomeLabel.trim() }},
{{ vm.userName }}
{{ vm.text }}
{{vm.newUser1}} {{vm.newUser2}} {{vm.newUser3}} {{vm.newUser4}}
{{ vm.unknownUser }}
{{ vm.title }}
{{ vm.title }}
{{ vm.title }}
- {{ vm.siteSelectorList.flyout.cell1.heading }} {{ site.countryLocale }} {{ vm.siteSelectorList.flyout.cell1.global.countryLocale }}
{{ vm.closeTabLabel }}
- {{ vm.flyout.cell2.title }} {{ vm.flyout.cell2.newTabAllow }} {{ vm.flyout.cell2.title }}
- {{ vm.flyout.cell3.title }} {{ vm.flyout.cell3.newTabAllow }} {{ vm.flyout.cell3.title }}
- {{ vm.flyout.cell1.viewAll.label }} {{ vm.flyout.cell1.viewAll.newTabAllow }} {{ vm.flyout.cell1.viewAll.label }}
Tax treaty update: U.S. Senate approves Protocols with Switzerland, Luxembourg, Japan
Tax treaty update: U.S. Senate approves Protocols
The U.S. Senate today approved Protocols amending the existing income tax treaties with Switzerland, Luxembourg, and Japan.
Summary of provisions in Protocols
- Switzerland: The Protocol to amend the income tax treaty with Switzerland was signed in September 2009. The Protocol provides for:
- Exemption from source-country withholding tax cross-border dividends beneficially owned by certain pension funds or other retirement arrangements (or individual retirement savings plans) that are approved by the competent authorities of both countries
- Broad exchange of information between competent authorities for tax purposes
- Mandatory binding arbitration of unresolved competent authority cases
- Luxembourg: The Protocol to amend the income tax treaty with Luxembourg was signed in May 2009, and provides for broad exchange of information between competent authorities for tax purposes.
- Japan: The Protocol to amend the income tax treaty with Japan was signed in January 2013. The Protocol provides for:
- Exemption from withholding taxes on interest (subject to certain exceptions)
- Expansion of the scope of dividends eligible for exemption from withholding tax (allowing 50%-owned companies to qualify, and reducing the required holding period from 12 months to six (6) months)
- Amendments to the capital gains article for consistency with the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act (FIRPTA)
- Mandatory binding arbitration of unresolved competent authority cases
- Provisions to enable the competent authorities to assist each other in the collection of taxes
- Broad exchange of information between the competent authorities for tax purposes
- Spain: Last evening, the Senate approved a Protocol to amend the income tax treaty with Spain. Read TaxNewsFlash. The Protocol with Spain was signed in January 2013, and provides for:
- Exemption from withholding taxes for interest (subject to certain exceptions), royalties, and capital gains
- Exemption from withholding tax for dividends paid to certain pension funds, or to companies holding shares representing 80% or more of voting power in the subsidiary and meeting certain other requirements (and a parallel exemption from branch profits tax)
- A new comprehensive limitation on benefits (LOB) article
- A new provision addressing income earned through fiscally transparent entities
- Mandatory binding arbitration of unresolved competent authority cases
- Broad exchange of information between competent authorities for tax purposes
KPMG observation
Now that the Protocols have been approved by the Senate, there are certain ministerial actions required (such as preparation and exchange of articles of ratification) before ratification is completed in the United States and before the Protocols can enter into force.
These Protocols were negotiated and signed long before the December 2017 enactment of the U.S. tax law (Pub. L. No. 115-97) that is often referred to as the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act” (TCJA). The Protocols do not appear, however, to modify provisions of the respective treaties that would arguably be relevant to the TCJA.
New income tax treaties with Hungary, Poland, and Chile are still pending. There is no Senate action scheduled on these treaties at this time. Provisions of these full treaties could arguably conflict provisions of the TCJA, and in the case of any conflict, the treaties would prevail because they would be later in time.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.
