The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) released details of the next steps to be taken in studying several possible tax proposals to revise geographic allocation of taxation rights through amended profit allocation and nexus tax rules.
In the June 2019 webcast ("Tax Talks") the OECD reviewed its "Programme of Work to Develop a Consensus Solution to the Tax Challenges Arising from the Digitalization of the Economy”—that outlines how it will come to a consensus-based agreement with the international community on these tax issues.
The OECD said it will also continue to look at the proposed rules to determine that multinational enterprises (MNEs) face a minimum level of taxation, and noted that in the future, it will study the economic and potential overall effects of its proposals before it makes any final decision on new rules. It may offer public consultations on the new rules later, as the proposals are refined.
The new digital tax proposals focus on the allocation of taxing rights, including nexus issues, and typically allocate more taxing rights to market or user jurisdictions where value is created through businesses' participation in the user or market jurisdiction that is not recognized in the current framework for allocating profits. These alternatives were initially outlined by the OECD in a "Policy Note" issued January 2019, and that was followed by a consultation report in February 2019. The proposals address remaining base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) issues and generally intend that MNEs pay a minimum level of tax, through the introduction of global anti-base erosion rules.
This recent agreement on the approach to discussing these issues was laid out by the 129 members of the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) and published in May 2019. Read TaxNewsFlash
The planned approach was also endorsed by G20 Finance Ministers in Fukuoka, Japan in June 2019. In the report, the OECD confirmed the international community's continued commitment to reach a consensus-based long-term solution on taxation and the global digital economy by 2020.
The OECD reported it is exploring three approaches to determine how much of an MNE's profit is to be allocated to market jurisdictions, and then how to allocate that profit among those market jurisdictions. The three approaches being explored are:
Other issues to be discussed (and relevant for each of the approaches noted above) will include:
A new "non-physical presence nexus rule" could allow market jurisdictions to tax certain profits generated within their borders using an alternative approach. This rule would require a remote, but sustained and significant business presence at the MNE group level (rather than the legal entity level), and could consider factors such as revenue thresholds, targeted marketing activities, and digital engagement in the jurisdiction, among other factors. The implementation of a new nexus rule could include changes to existing tax treaties, which could potentially be facilitated through the use of the multilateral instrument (MLI) or a new multilateral approach.
Global anti-base erosion rules
The global anti-base erosion rules are generally intended to provide for a minimum level of tax being paid by MNEs. Under these proposals, four separate rules are being explored, and these could provide jurisdictions with the ability to "tax back" profits that are subject to low effective rate of tax. The proposals that will be explored include:
The OECD's next steps include technical work on the various proposals by different working groups, with the first impact assessment scheduled to be completed by the fall of 2019. By the end of 2019, the OECD hopes to find a unified approach among the proposals being explored, and launch a further public consultation.
Read a June 2019 report prepared by the KPMG member firm in Canada
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.