The U.S. Tax Court today held that the IRS revenue agent had failed to obtain written supervisory approval before the first formal communication of an initial determination to assess penalties, and therefore did not meet the burden of production for penalties under section 7491.
The case is: Clay v. Commissioner, 152 T.C. No. 13 (April 24, 2019). Read the Tax Court’s opinion [PDF 165 KB]
In these consolidated cases, the taxpayers were members of the Miccosukee tribe (a federally recognized Native American tribe). During the years at issue, the tribe operated a casino in Florida on tribal land that was owned communally by all members. The tribe made regular distributions from casino revenue to each member. The taxpayers received these distributions and did not report them as income.
The IRS determined that the distributions were taxable to the taxpayers and, therefore, that the taxpayers had unreported taxable income for the amounts of the distributions. The IRS also determined that the taxpayers were liable for accuracy-related penalties under section 6662(a).
A question presented in this case was whether IRS supervisory approval for imposition of penalties can come after the revenue agent sends the taxpayers the proposed adjustments that include penalties.
The taxpayers asserted that the initial determination of a penalty would be “the first time an IRS official introduced the penalty into the conversation” and further claimed that the Revenue Agent Report (RAR) contained the first suggestion of penalties, making the RAR—and not the notice of deficiency—the initial determination.
According to a summary provided by the Tax Court:
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.