The Mumbai Bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal issued a decision concerning the taxability of agency commission relating to the services rendered outside India.
The case is: Fox International Channel Asia Pacific Ltd. v. DCIT
The taxpayer was a foreign company engaged in the distribution of satellite television channels and sale of advertisement air time for the channel companies at a global level. The taxpayer was not a channel owner, but was a service provider to group companies owning various television channels. The channel companies appointed the taxpayer as an agent to sell advertising air time on the channels, to distribute the channels in the territories where the channels were being broadcast, and to procure syndication revenues for the contents of the channels. The taxpayer did not maintain an India-specific financial statement or India-specific account.
The taxpayer originally filed its tax return based on unaudited global financial statements, which return was subsequently revised based on its audited global financial statements and those of its channel companies.
The Transfer Pricing Officer determined that the taxpayer and the channel companies had bench-marked the international transaction by adopting the profit split method as most appropriate. The Transfer Pricing Officer observed that the taxpayer determined the arm’s length price profit of INR 2525 million under the profit split method. However, in the computation of income, it offered to tax in India an amount of INR 2278 million. The difference of INR 247 million would be treated as an adjustment to the arm’s length process. The Assessing Officer made an addition to the income of the taxpayer.
The Dispute Resolution Panel rejected the taxpayer’s contention that part of the commission income does not fall within the purview of section 9 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (taxing income that does not accrue or arise in India but accrues or arises outside India).
The tribunal rejected the findings of the Dispute Resolution Panel—holding that the actual profit attributable to India is a purely factual issue that has to be demonstrated by the taxpayer through proper documentary evidence and books of account. The tribunal restored the issue to the Assessing Officer to examine the taxpayer’s claim. Because the claim of the taxpayer that actual profit attributable to India of INR 2278 million was found to be correct, no further adjustment could be made to the arm’s length price since the Transfer Pricing Officer concluded that the profit margin of the international transaction shown by the taxpayer was higher than the average margin of the comparable.
Read a March 2019 report [PDF 614 KB] prepared by the KPMG member firm in India
© 2021 Copyright owned by one or more of the KPMG International entities. KPMG International entities provide no services to clients. All rights reserved.
KPMG refers to the global organization or to one or more of the member firms of KPMG International Limited (“KPMG International”), each of which is a separate legal entity. KPMG International Limited is a private English company limited by guarantee and does not provide services to clients. For more detail about our structure please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.
Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.