The Trump Administration today released its fiscal year (FY) 2018 budget, entitled “A New Foundation for American Greatness.” The budget contains the administration’s recommendations to Congress for spending and taxation for the fiscal year that begins on October 1, 2017.
Read more about the FY 2018 budget on the White House website.
In recent fiscal years, the Treasury Department has released an explanation of the tax proposals in the budget (known as the “Green Book”) the same day an administration transmitted its budget to Congress. The Treasury Department has not released a Green Book with respect to the Trump Administration’s FY 2018 budget proposals.
The budget states the Trump Administration’s commitment to tax reform and simplification. It indicates that the administration has articulated several “core principles that will guide its discussions with taxpayers, businesses, Members of Congress, and other stakeholders.” It further indicates that “the President is committed to continuing to work with Congress and other stakeholders to carefully and deliberatively build on these principles.”
The budget “assumes deficit neutral tax reform” and indicates that the administration will work closely with the Congress on such reform.
Individual tax reform
The budget states that tax relief for U.S. families, especially middle-income families, must do the following:
Business tax reform
The budget expresses the administration’s belief that business tax reform must do the following:
The budget does not include additional technical details on the administration’s tax reform proposals beyond what Treasury Secretary Mnuchin and National Economic Council (NEC) Director Cohn previously announced at a White House press conference on April 26, 2107. Read TaxNewsFlash
Treasury Secretary Mnuchin is scheduled to testify before the House Ways and Means Committee on May 24, 2017, and before the Senate Finance Committee on May 25, 2017, about the administration’s budget, including its tax proposals. Read TaxNewsFlash and TaxNewsFlash. It is possible that further details could be announced during those hearings.
In the context of other policy initiatives, the budget also references several proposals that may relate to tax. For example:
The administration’s budget proposals also address domestic and defense spending, as well as welfare reform. Among other things, the budget proposes:
The budget also expresses the administration’s commitment to work with Congress to repeal and replace healthcare reform legislation enacted by the Obama Administration.The budget states that, by including anticipated economic gains that will result from the president’s fiscal, economic, and regulatory policies, the deficit will be reduced by $5.6 trillion compared to the current fiscal path.
As is the case with any administration’s budget proposals, there is no expectation that Congress will enact—or even vote on—the president’s budget as a whole. Instead, the budget represents the administration’s view of the optimum direction of spending and revenue policy.
Congress is not required to pass a budget for FY 2018. However, Congress currently is expected to try to pass a budget resolution for FY 2018, taking into account input from the Trump Administration.
Very generally, a budget resolution sets forth broad targets for spending and revenue goals and instructs various congressional committees to draft legislation meeting particular objectives. Both the House and Senate would need to agree on the identical budget resolution; however, the president would not need to sign the resolution into law.
If the Congress were to pass a budget resolution for FY 2018, this would set the stage for using special budget reconciliation rules to move the implementing legislation. These rules allow legislation meeting certain requirements to be moved forward in the Senate with only a majority of votes (rather than needing 60 votes to avoid a filibuster). The reconciliation rules, however, include a number of procedural "bells and whistles," including that reconciliation legislation generally cannot create a deficit outside the budget window. Congress currently is using the budget reconciliation process for the current (FY 2017) year to address healthcare reform legislation. If Congress passes a budget resolution for FY 2018 before such healthcare reform legislation is enacted, the healthcare reform legislation could lose its reconciliation procedural protections.
Congressional Republicans currently are expected to attempt to move tax reform using the FY 2018 budget reconciliation process. This would require the House and Senate to agree to a budget resolution for FY 2018 that includes instructions for the tax-writing committees to achieve specified revenue goals. If the budget resolution also deals with other issues (such as spending levels and, possibly, entitlements), passing such a resolution might be complicated by different views among Republicans on different issues.
In addition, the timing of passing a budget resolution for FY 2018 might be delayed as long as reconciliation procedures are still needed to move healthcare reform legislation. Nonetheless, Congress can do preliminary work on many of the issues that would be addressed in reconciliation before passing a budget resolution.
It also is important to note that, if Congress uses a FY 2018 budget resolution to move tax reform, the tax title would need to comply with the procedural requirements of reconciliation (including the requirement of not increasing the deficit outside the budget window). Thus, using reconciliation could affect the design and substance of tax legislation.
© 2019 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”) is a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.