Chairman Hatch remarks on Senate tax reform process | KPMG United States
Share with your friends

Chairman Hatch's remarks on Senate tax reform process

Hatch's remarks on U.S. Senate tax reform process

The Senate Finance Committee on February 1, 2017, released the text of a speech Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-UT) delivered at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce regarding the committee’s priorities in this Congress.


Related content

Chairman Hatch addressed tax reform, as well as healthcare and trade issues, in his remarks. Read text of the speech

General tax reform principles

Chairman Hatch indicated that Republicans are united in their commitment to tax reform and that Republicans in the House, Senate, and White House agree on “virtually every” fundamental tax reform principle.  For example, he noted that:

  • Republicans agree that tax reform should be comprehensive and should address both the individual and business tax systems.
  • Republicans agree that the tax system should be simplified by reducing the number of special interest credits and deductions and creating fewer tax brackets.
  • Republicans agree that a fairer tax system is needed that treats similarly situated taxpayers similarly and picks fewer winners and losers.  
  • Most Republicans support repeal or reform of the estate tax.
  • Republicans agree there is a need to make the United States more competitive by reducing corporate rates and moving to a territorial tax system.  

Chairman Hatch then remarked that, because Republicans agree on the fundamental issues and principles, “there is every reason to be optimistic” that they can work through the design details as the process moves forward.    

Border adjustability

With regard to the House border adjustability proposal, Chairman Hatch said that “it’s too early” for him to have a definitive position on the issue, but indicated that he had the following questions:

  • Who will ultimately bear the tax? To what extent will it be borne by consumers, workers, shareholders, and foreigners?
  • Is border adjustability consistent with U.S. international trade obligations?  
  • Because border adjustability would likely be a significant shift in business tax policy, would adjustments need to be made to ensure that the United States is not unduly increasing the tax burden on specific industries? 

Although Chairman Hatch indicated that “we don’t have definitive answers to any of those questions at this point,” he proceeded to state that:


I know that Chairman Brady is very adamant about the proposal, which, in my view, is a mark in its favor. I also know that at least a handful of Senators have serious reservations about border adjustability, and that requires us to consider the bigger picture.  

Senate tax reform process

Chairman Hatch then explained the politics of tax reform in the Senate, observing that Republicans only have 52 seats in the Senate. As a result, even if budget reconciliation is used for tax reform (so that tax reform can be moved with less than the 60 Senate votes that might otherwise be required), Republicans only have a “margin of error” of two seats. Thus, he expressed a preference for finding a bipartisan path forward, but indicated that, if “…we don’t get any Democrats on board, we’ll basically need universal Republican support to pass anything through reconciliation.”  

As a result, Chairman Hatch observed that producing a bill that can get through the Senate likely will require “a separate Senate tax reform process, which will almost surely end up looking different from what passes in the House.” In this regard, he noted that “no one should expect the Senate to simply take up and pass a House tax reform bill.”  He proceeded to state that, “this is not to say that I plan to oppose or disregard Chairman Brady’s bill when it comes out,” but that, far from that, “I am confident that their tax reform plan will provide a strong, legitimate path forward.”   

Chairman Hatch then indicated that the Senate is in the early stages of its tax reform process and is considering various proposals.  He concluded that:


Our hope is to have a tax reform proposal in one form or another to discuss publicly in the near future. From there, we’ll have to see how the process unfolds, working with our leadership, our colleagues in the House, and, of course, the administration on the next steps.  

Health care and trade

Chairman Hatch also discussed healthcare reform, trade, and other issues.   

With regard to healthcare reform generally, Chairman Hatch’s remarks focused on process—including the expected use of the budget reconciliation process to repeal portions of the Affordable Care Act—and said little about what the proposed replacement for Obamacare will look like. However, with respect to the taxes contained in the Affordable Care Act, he observed that “we need to definitively answer the question about what to do with the Obamacare taxes.  Some have argued that we should keep all or some of them in place and use them to pay for our eventual replacement package.”  

Chairman Hatch then noted that, in his view, “[a]ll of the Obamacare taxes need to go as part of the repeal process.”  Chairman Hatch did not indicate how Congress planned to pay for any future healthcare reform legislation.  For more information on the Affordable Care Act tax provisions that may be affected by healthcare reform, read KPMG’s What’s News in Tax: What Does the Future Hold for the Tax Provisions of the Affordable Care Act? [PDF 72 KB].  

KPMG observation

Chairman Hatch, in the past, has expressed interest in “integrating” the tax system, possibly through providing a dividends paid deduction for C corporations. 

© 2019 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.

KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”) is a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.

The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.

Connect with us


Request for proposal