We review an Advocate General’s opinion which adds significant complexity to VAT recovery by a branch supporting its foreign head office.
The lack of clarity regarding the VAT recovery rules applicable to a branch supporting its head office has led to practical difficulties and the application of different deduction methods across the EU. On 3 October 2018, Advocate General Mengozzi handed down his opinion in Morgan Stanley (Case C-165/17). If the court agrees with him, the method used to determine the recoverable proportion of input tax may become severely complex in cross-border scenarios. Taxpayers operating in the financial and insurance sectors may need to consider their current cross-border intra-entity flows and anticipate potential risks regarding their VAT recovery position.
In an article for Tax Journal*, Philippe Gamito and Irina Maslova review an Advocate General’s opinion which adds significant complexity to VAT recovery by a branch supporting its foreign head office.
* First published in Tax Journal on 12 October 2018. Reproduced with permission
For further information, please contact:
© 2020 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”) is a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.