Implications of the recent decision in the leading case of Hastings Insurance Services Ltd and HMRC v KPMG LLP (Third Party).
On 15 August 2018, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) released its decision in Hastings Insurance Services Ltd and HMRC v KPMG LLP (Third Party) and allowed an application by KPMG for inspection of the parties’ pleadings and skeleton arguments in the underlying appeal. The decision is the first time that the FTT has clearly set out the status and accessibility of documents filed in the course of a tax appeal and it clarifies a murky area of law which had been left unaddressed by the FTT rules. The FTT’s decision that some documents can be inspected after a hearing if a third party can establish a ‘legitimate interest’ has significant ramifications for open justice, taxpayers privacy and practitioners’ drafting, especially given the broad nature of what precisely constitutes a ‘legitimate interest’.
In an article for Tax Journal*, Amanda Brown and Chris Leigh discuss the implications of the recent decision in the Hastings Insurance case.
*First published in Tax Journal on 14 September 2018. Reproduced with permission.
© 2020 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”) is a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.