Changes in work patterns and the Gig Economy | KPMG | UK
Share with your friends

IFS Green Budget – Changes in work patterns and the Gig Economy

Changes in work patterns and the Gig Economy

Interesting things are happening in the labour market, but nothing fundamental has changed. Yet.


Also on

There has been plenty of media attention in recent times on how our working habits are evolving and changing. And plenty of political scrutiny too. Against this backdrop, the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) have published a report entitled ‘Tax, legal form and the gig economy’, which looks at how the UK labour market is changing. 

Amongst the various reviews which are also ongoing:

  • The Treasury Committee has called for evidence and views on the shrinking tax base. Specifically they have asked for views on multi-jobbing and different ways of working;
  • The Taylor Review was launched in November 2016 under the instruction of the Prime Minister. This will look at modern employment practices and is being undertaken by the Royal Society of the Arts;
  • The Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) Committee launched an inquiry into the future world of work focussing on the status and rights of workers operating in the ‘Gig Economy’;
  • The Work and Pensions Committee has also started their own review to consider how the welfare system can support self-employed gig workers; and
  • A Cross-Government Working Group on Employment Status is also considering the potential to move to a more uniform set of tests on employment status across tax, employment rights and the welfare and social security system.

So the IFS report is timely. 

Based on their analysis, the vast bulk (85 percent or 31.5m) of the workforce remain in traditional employment while the rest (15 percent or 4.5m) work for their own business. Of those, 500,000 work via their own company (known as a personal service company (PSC)) and 4m work as sole traders. 

While these splits may not be that far removed from long term trends, what is interesting is that a lot of the recent growth in the workforce has been attributable to the number working for their own business – a far higher percentage than one would expect given the 85 percent:15 percent split.

What is more, the proportionate rate of growth attributable to those working for their own PSC is even higher still; the number of PSCs has doubled since 2008. 

More interestingly, the legal form adopted seems to be dependent on the industry in which the individual works, with sole traders more likely to be found in construction, retail, taxi drivers and legal and accountancy services, and PSCs tending to be found in the IT and consultancy services. 

So what does this mean? Somewhat surprisingly, the IFS acknowledges that, while traditional sources of data are not set up to capture the gig economy, industries with prominent growth in self-employment are not associated with the gig economy. Fundamentally, the data is just not there at the moment to judge either way.

So to what extent could the trend be driven by tax considerations? The report goes on to consider the respective effective tax rates of employment versus self-employment versus PSCs. And while it does not attribute the trend to the tax differential, it does make the case that the lack of homogeneity in the tax consequences may be skewing how people choose to work. 

The report makes the argument that such divergence in tax rates is not desirable and that the traditional arguments used to support such differentials (e.g. NICs for self-employed should be lower as they have reduced entitlement to benefits) are no longer valid.

The proposed solution, at least to the tax question, is to design a system of taxation which would tax returns to capital and labour at the same rate at the margin, without disincentivising saving and investing. But as the report acknowledges, this would require major reform over a number of years; it is not a case of piecemeal reform but systematic root and branch review. 

It will be interesting to see what the various reviews mentioned in the introduction to this article recommend since they will all be reporting on broadly the same topic. And it will be interesting to see how the Government responds.

Perhaps it was recognised that wider reform would be required, with the Chancellor’s letter to the OTS, after declining to proceed with the alignment of Income Tax and NIC, stating that the Government would: “look at how it can ensure that the taxation of different ways of working and different forms of employee remuneration is fair, sustainable and efficient.”

Watch this space.


For further information please contact :

Seamus Murphy

Connect with us


Request for proposal