Help in budget 2016 for Singapore companies to go into ASEAN and beyond
Help in budget 2016 for Singapore companies
The article was published in the The Business Times on 10 March 2016.
Internationalisation is a way of life for Singapore companies looking to create value by expanding beyond the confines of the limited domestic market.
Companies are often attracted to the lucrative overseas markets, but may be hesitant about treading unchartered waters, particularly when it comes to their duty to tax authorities.
Add in new business models like e-commerce, where the nature of business and income may be defined differently by various jurisdictions and the complexity for businesses rises.
Nonetheless, companies should not be daunted by the prospects of starting up in a new place.
Take the potential of ASEAN, for instance, which has a combined market worth some US$2.6 trillion dollars and a population of over 625 million.
Unfortunately, there is no tax harmonisation within the ASEAN-bloc, nor is there any move being contemplated towards this end.
Some form of tax harmonisation, such as the abolishment of withholding taxes for payments like interest, dividends, royalties and services fees between companies within the ASEAN region, would have gone a long way to promoting freer movement of capital and technology across the ASEAN countries.
Hence, the challenge is for Singapore’s companies to be well-equipped with the relevant know-how to navigate each country’s tax and regulatory systems.
Fortunately, there are many available subsidies and schemes to help companies internationalise.
Enhance grants for overseas expansion
One of the most popular and useful schemes that Singapore companies can use to internationalise is the Market Readiness Assistance (MRA) grant, which is administered by International Enterprise Singapore.
Taking the first step in the journey of internationalisation is often fraught with risks and uncertainty.
Feasibility studies on the new market, including the type of tax and regulatory requirements or consumer behaviour, have to be conducted to help companies in their expansion ambitions.
Currently, the MRA scheme provides businesses with a 70% subsidy capped at $20,000 per year to pay for expenses related to the assessing of markets and setting up of overseas ventures.
However, to be more effective, the grant should be increased to help companies tide over the heavy costs involved in making the foray into foreign territory.
The cap on the grant should therefore be at least doubled to take into account the expected high initial start-up costs.
Reduce excessive tax burden
Once the foreign operations are up and running, businesses could find their margins squeezed by taxes on their incomes.
Singapore’s tax treaties are set up to avoid double taxation when Singapore companies venture overseas, but there are many situations where double taxation would still arise.
Often, these double tax situations result from conflicting technical interpretations between tax authorities on taxation rights under the respective tax treaties.
While these conflicts should usually be resolved through the mutual agreement procedure provided for under these treaties, these procedures are often time consuming and may be a heavy burden on smaller companies.
The Government can consider having a higher tax relief for overseas income, especially in relation to foreign services income.
Under the current system, unilateral tax relief is available for businesses which incur overseas taxes only in the absence of a tax treaty with the country where the income was received from.
Instead, the unilateral tax credit should be simplified and made less restrictive by allowing it to apply in any foreign taxes levied on overseas services income, regardless of whether there is a tax treaty.
In addition, the current tax exemption for certain gains that may be realised from the disposal of subsidiaries should be incorporated as a permanent feature of Singapore’s tax system. This is to provide certainty for gains made on the disposal of subsidiaries and associate companies and enhance Singapore’s status as a regional headquarter location.
At present, the non-taxation of gains from the disposal of equity investments is only applicable to ordinary shares sold on or before 31 May 2017. This concession is especially helpful for companies that intend to grow through acquisitions.
As financial and market conditions look to wane amid a cooling global economy, more mergers and acquisitions opportunities could arise.
Another tax incentive scheme that could do with some tweaking to benefit more businesses is the International Growth Scheme (IGS).
Singapore companies with high growth potential to expand overseas are provided with a 10 percent concessionary tax rate on incremental qualifying income in excess of base income.
The IGS can be made more attractive by allowing the tax incentive to apply to all qualifying income, not just incremental income.
Maximising benefits of free trade agreements (FTAs)
Even though Singapore has a wide network of FTAs, many small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) have still not utilised them when exporting from Singapore to the countries that have signed FTAs with Singapore or ASEAN.
Their main deterrence is the difficulty in understanding the legal text of the FTAs.
Most SMEs do not have the competent resource to analyse the legal text and do not want to face a huge penalty in the event of non-compliance.
As FTAs could help lower the landed cost of their products in the importing countries, it will increase market access for Singapore companies.
To support SMEs in understanding and applying for FTAs, specific cash grants under MRA of up to $20,000 could be designed for SMEs which successfully implement their pilot FTA certificate for their shipments out of Singapore.
Such cash grants will ease the financial burden of the SMEs in finding the competent resource to assist them in setting up the framework for applying FTA and handholding them to get the FTA certificate for a pilot.
Pushing into new territory
Singapore businesses cannot simply rely on the small local market for continued growth. Staying put alone is also not an appealing option as competition from abroad in our small, open economy will mean a reduced slice of the pie.
By heading for new markets, the size of their potential pie can be enlarged significantly and with the proposed measures, they will have greater certainty and capacity in taking the leap.
The article is contributed by Harvey Koenig, Partner and Head of ASEAN Incentives Advisory and Angelia Chew, Partner and Asia Pacific Trade and Customs Leader, KPMG in Singapore.