KPMG comes out with Global Manufacturing Outlook (GMO): Performance in the Crosshairs

Global Manufacturing Outlook (GMO)

Manufacturers look to improve profitable growth through innovation, collaboration and supply chain integration.


Related content

This fifth annual Global Manufacturing Outlook, Performance in the Crosshairs, was completed in early 2014 and surveyed 460 senior executives across six industrial sectors split equally among the Americas; Europe, Middle East and Africa; and Asia-Pacific.

“Over the past few years, manufacturers have seen an explosion of new technologies and innovative developments in material science, advanced manufacturing and synergistic operating models. With this accelerating pace of change, manufacturers the world over are now starting to take stock of the more complex world that they are operating in, and are using that insight to redefine ‘the art of the possible’,” noted Jeff Dobbs, Global Chair, Industrial Manufacturing and a Partner with KPMG in the US.

In an attempt to capitalize on this environment, manufacturers say they will dramatically increase spending in R&D, pursue new collaborative business models and integrate new technologies to analyze and stimulate profitable growth.

A focus on understanding profitability

This year’s GMO reveals that only 12 percent of manufacturers would categorize themselves as being ‘very effective’ at determining product profitability. Further, 85 percent of respondents said they plan to make either “moderate” to “substantial” investments into systems for product or service cost improvement over the next 12-24 months.

“This isn’t simply about mining data and building spreadsheets; it’s about accessing the appropriate information, at the right level of granularity and – maybe most importantly – with the right speed and frequency to generate timely insights that help people make better business decisions,” noted Jim Scalise, a Management Consulting Partner with KPMG in the US.

Growth through innovation and collaboration

According to the KPMG’s 2014 GMO, almost half of manufacturers plan to double R&D spending in product development over the next 12-24 months. There are also signs that breakthrough innovation is gaining importance as a strategy for 39 percent of industrial manufacturers, up 8 percentage points from KPMG’s 2013 GMO, representing a 25 percent increase in companies pursuing such strategies.

“The manufacturing world is in an era of hyper-innovation,” said Dobbs. “Ultimately, those organizations that do not balance investment in ‘incremental innovation’ with investment in ‘breakthrough innovation’ may find themselves left behind competitively.”

Manufacturers in Germany appear set to lead in breakthrough innovation with 77 percent citing it as their primary R&D strategy for product development. Among the industrial sectors included in the survey, 50 percent of respondents from the Conglomerates sector say breakthrough innovation will be their primary R&D strategy.

In terms of business models, 88 percent of respondents say partnerships over in-house efforts will shape manufacturers’ approach to innovation, up significantly from 51 percent in KPMG’s 2013 GMO. Additionally, 68 percent say they are adopting more collaborative business models with suppliers and customers. In EMEA, respondents were overwhelmingly in strong agreement with adopting more collaborative models (82 percent).

Improving supply chain visibility

This year’s GMO reveals that limited visibility across the supply chain remains a growing concern for manufacturers, even though many have made notable progress towards improving transparency.

Forty percent – versus 20 percent in KPMG’s 2013 GMO – say they lack information and material visibility across their supply base. Thirty eight percent say they lack critical details on supplier performance, and 36 percent lack adequate supply chain IT systems. According to half of respondents, the biggest obstacle to achieving more visibility is a lack of mature technology, followed by lack of governance (19 percent) and lack of strategy (14 percent).

Despite those challenges, visibility has improved over the past twelve months with 22 percent of respondents now claiming to have complete visibility (up from just 9 percent in 2013). For the most part, these gains in visibility have resulted from stronger relationships between manufacturers and their top tier suppliers. More than three quarters of respondents say that their relationship with top tier suppliers is now strong enough for them to share real-time capacity and demand data.

"Only those companies that can forgo the desire to get the immediate gain and invest in establishing long-term relations with suppliers will be successful in building supply chains," says Konstantin Rybakov, Head of Supply Chain and Procurement, KPMG in Russia and the CIS. "Russian manufacturers should also pay particular attention to the following important trends: opening of representative offices of international manufacturing companies in China and improving efficiency through the use of international best practices." According to Konstantin, the main difficulties that companies can face in building efficient supply chains in Russia are substandard transport infrastructure considerably limiting the possibility of extending and developing supply chains and immature competition in the logistic services market that leads to non-optimal prices.

About the survey

The 2014 Global Manufacturing Outlook was conducted by Forbes on behalf of KPMG International in early 2014. Respondents represented six industries: Aerospace and Defense, Automotive, Conglomerates, Consumer Products, Engineering and Industrial Products, and Metals. Fifty percent of respondents held C-level positions and a third represented organizations with more than US$5 billion in annual revenue.

Please click here to download the survey.

© 2021 KPMG. KPMG refers to JSC “KPMG”, “KPMG Tax and Advisory” LLC, companies incorporated under the laws of the Russian Federation, and KPMG Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008, member firms of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms. All rights reserved.

For more detail about the structure of the KPMG global organization please visit

Connect with us