With the Government’s books “back in the black”, Budget 2017 puts it on the line with a $2 billion a year “families’ income” tax cut and assistance package.
As widely foreshadowed, the key measures are aimed at increasing money in the pockets of working families. This relief is in the form of income tax threshold changes and increases in Working for Families and accommodation benefits, targeted at lower and middle income earners.
The Government estimates that its Budget 2017 centrepiece will benefit around 1.3 million families by an average of around $26 a week.
|Tax rate||Current tax thresholds||From 1 April 2018:||Increase in threshold|
|10.5%||Nil to $14,000||Nill to $22,000||+$8,000|
|17.5%||$14,001 to $48,000||$22,001 to $52,000||+ $4,000|
|30%||$48,001 to $70,000||$52,001 to $70,000||No change|
|33%||$70,001||$70,001 +||No change|
1 April 2018. The Minister of Finance has indicated this is to alleviate pressure on Inland Revenue’s systems from a 1 October 2017 start. This is certainly a factor given Inland Revenue’s ongoing Business Transformation.
The more cynical may also look ahead to September.
New Zealand’s fiscal position coming out of the global financial crisis left the Government little room for manoeuvre. Add to this the fiscal strain from subsequent events like the Christchurch earthquakes.
The last tax changes, in 2010, (reductions in personal and company tax) were largely self-funding (from removing tax depreciation on buildings and increasing the GST rate). This left the fiscal position largely unchanged.
The Government’s stated approach to date has been one of prudence – getting its books in order – while continuing to fund key priorities and unexpected events. 2017 is the first Budget where the Government has felt there is enough fiscal headroom to offer tax relief. Plus, there is an election around the corner.
In the lead-up, the Government strongly hinted that it would be targeting relief to lower and middle income earners and their families. The Budget appears to have largely done that, with a particular focus on those on lower incomes.
Cutting taxes is an art, rather than a science. It involves a number of dimensions and can require difficult trade-offs. Some of the things to think about include:
Given the range of economic, social and political factors at play, an independent view on the Government’s tax and families’ package requires re-doing the Budget as a whole. We have focused instead on “fiscal drag”.
Fiscal drag, or bracket creep as it’s more colloquially known, is where, without adjustment, people can move to a higher tax band simply because their salary or wages rise by the rate of inflation. This is without any “real” increase in their income (as measured by the goods or services they can actually purchase). This is inequitable as their economic position is unchanged and is a windfall gain to the Government’s coffers.
We support lifting the income tax thresholds to combat fiscal drag.
The last personal tax cuts took effect from 1 October 2010. Those on the median salary or wage of around $48,000 pay 30%, the second highest tax rate, on their next dollar of income. In 2010, those on around $40,000 (the 2010 median salary or wage) paid 17.5%. There is tacit acknowledgement of the effect of fiscal drag in the Budget announcements.
There are different ways to index the income tax thresholds. We have calculated below what the tax thresholds would be if they were adjusted for the Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation from 1 October 2010. The cumulative CPI movement has been around 10.40%.
|Tax rate||Current||Budget 2017||Indexed|
The tax cut, for different income levels, under the different options is outlined below.
|Income ($)||$20,000||$40,000||$48,000 (median)||$70,000||$100,000||$150,000|
*This excludes the effect of the independent earner tax credit removal. The net tax cut will be $40 if someone currently receives that credit.
The personal tax changes in Budget 2017 do more than address fiscal drag since 2010 for those on lower incomes. The additional cash in hand changes will significantly exceed those from a simple CPI adjustment.
However, this benefit also flows to those on higher incomes as the same benefit passes to them. That is of course a natural effect of a progressive tax system, like New Zealand’s.
© 2020 KPMG, a New Zealand Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”) is a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.