The National Industrial Court of Nigeria (NICN or “the Court”), Abuja Judicial Division, recently delivered judgement in the case between Mr. Maroof Abdul Giwa (“the Claimant”) and ARM Pension Managers (PFA) Ltd. (ARM Pensions) & National Pension Commission (PenCom) (“the Defendants”) on the legality of the basis for computing the lump sum payable to the Claimant by ARM Pension in line with the guidelines issued by PenCom.
The crux of the matter was whether the 25% benchmark for lump sum withdrawal provided in the Pension Reform Act (PRA or “the Act”) applies to a policyholder who retires mandatorily at an age above 50 years.
Facts of the case
The Claimant retired from public service on 24 December
2017 at the age of 60 years and applied for the withdrawal of
a lump sum representing 50% or 75% from his retirement
savings account (RSA) domiciled with ARM Pensions, in line
with the provisions of the PRA. However, ARM Pensions
computed the lump sum at 25% which the Claimant refused
to accept. Consequently, the Claimant filed a lawsuit at the
NICN seeking a declaration that the offer of 25% of the RSA
balance was contrary to the express provisions of Section
7(1) of the Act and, therefore, unlawful, null and void.
Issues for determination
Based on the prayers of the parties, the Court formulated
the following issues for determination:
Click to download and read more on this newsletter.
© 2021 KPMG Professional Services, a partnership registered in Nigeria and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.
For more detail about the structure of the KPMG global organization please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.