Tax alert - Issue 5, March 2011
The Court of Final Appeal (CFA) dismissed the taxpayer's appeal in Fuchs, Walter Alfred Heinz v CIR  FACV 22/2000 in February 2011. At issue was whether two sums paid to Mr Fuchs on the termination of his employment were assessable to Salaries Tax as income from an office or employment within the meaning of section 8(1) of the Inland Revenue Ordinance (IRO). Alternatively, if the income was taxable, did it fall to be apportioned by virtue of section 8(1A) of the IRO.
© 2020 KPMG Huazhen LLP, a People's Republic of China partnership, KPMG Advisory (China) Limited, a limited liability company in China, KPMG, a Macau partnership and KPMG, a Hong Kong partnership, are member firms of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited ("KPMG International"), a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of KPMG International.
For more detail about the structure of the KPMG global organisation please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.