Share with your friends

Hungary: VAT reverse-charge mechanism, input VAT deduction (CJEU judgments)

Hungary: VAT reverse-charge mechanism, VAT

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued judgments in two value added tax (VAT) cases concerning application of the reverse-charge mechanism in Hungary.


Related content


In these VAT cases (Farkas, no. C-564/15, and PORR Építési Kft, no. C-691/17), the taxpayers received invoices that were issued in accordance with the general VAT rules (i.e., the supplier charged VAT on the invoices).The taxpayer receiving the invoices deducted the amount of VAT charged. The tax authority audited the invoices, and took a position that the underlying transactions came under the scope of reverse-charge VAT, and thus denied the deduction of input VAT.

The cases were eventually referred to the CJEU which considered the following questions:

  • The practice of the Hungarian tax authority is to deny input VAT at the level of the purchaser of goods (or recipient of a service) in situations when the seller of the goods (or supplier of the service) charges VAT in its invoices (and declares and remits the amount of VAT), even though the reverse-charge mechanism applies to the transaction. Is this treatment compatible or not compatible with EU law?
  • Is the tax authority required to investigate whether the issuer of the invoice is able to revise the invoice and return the VAT to the purchaser (recipient) before denying the right of deduction of input VAT at the purchaser (recipient)? 

CJEU judgments

According to the CJEU:

  • It is not in contravention of EU law if the tax authority makes an assessment regarding the application of the reverse-charge mechanism against the taxpayer—even if the state treasury suffered no shortage in relation to the transaction.
  • The taxpayer receiving the invoices does not have the right to deduct VAT because the sum paid to the supplier cannot be deemed to be a tax paid by the supplier to the state treasury.
  • However, the principles of fiscal neutrality and effectiveness require that the taxpayer—having incorrectly deducted the VAT—be able to exercise its right to reimbursement of the unduly charged VAT directly from the state treasury if reimbursement from the supplier becomes impossible or excessively difficult in certain circumstances (for instance, insolvency or liquidation of the supplier).
  • The tax authority is not required to investigate the ability of the supplier to revise the VAT treatment of a transaction. Accordingly, the possibility for reimbursement from the state treasury must be considered by the purchasers (recipients) subject to such assessment by the tax authority, and such reimbursement may be requested in a separate procedure.

In accordance with the CJEU judgements, in situations when the tax authority makes assessments when correction of the invoices was not possible because of insolvency or liquidation of the supplier, it would be prudent to consider and investigate if there is a possibility for reimbursing the VAT directly from the state treasury.  

Read a May 2019 report prepared by the KPMG member firm in Hungary

© 2021 Copyright owned by one or more of the KPMG International entities. KPMG International entities provide no services to clients. All rights reserved.

KPMG refers to the global organization or to one or more of the member firms of KPMG International Limited (“KPMG International”), each of which is a separate legal entity. KPMG International Limited is a private English company limited by guarantee and does not provide services to clients. For more detail about our structure please visit

Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.

The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.

Connect with us


Want to do business with KPMG?


loading image Request for proposal

Stay up to date with what matters to you

Gain access to personalized content based on your interests by signing up today

Sign up today