The German Federal Tax Court (BFH) has been uncertain as to what details are required for an input value added tax (VAT) refund application and specifically what “number of the invoice” is to be designated.
Seeking guidance to address this issue, the German court requested that the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) clarify the matter. The CJEU submission concerns Art. 8 (2) (d) of the Directive 2008/9/EC—that provides that for every refund, the invoice must include the invoice number and it must be provided in a refund claim application. In particular, the German court asked if an indication of the reference number on the invoice, shown as an additional classification criterion besides the invoice number, suffices. According to the German court, the principle of neutrality and the principle of proportionality suggest this classification information would be sufficient.
In a separate matter, the Lower Tax Court of Saarland asked the CJEU for a preliminary ruling on the place of transfer of company cars transferred to employees. This question would affect commuters living in border areas and working in another country. The court asked the CJEU whether Article 56(2) or Article 45 sent. 1 of the VAT Directive is relevant for taxation. Under Article 56(2), the place of leasing of a means of transport to non-taxable persons, with the exception of short-term hires, would be the place where the customer is established, domiciled or habitually resident. Otherwise, under the first sentence of Article 45 of the VAT Directive, the place of supply of services to a non-taxable person is the place where the supplier has established its business.
Other recent VAT developments that may affect businesses in Germany include the following items:
Read a May 2019 report [PDF 288 KB] prepared by the KPMG member firm in Germany
© 2020 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.