The Supreme Administrative Court issued a judgment finding that the difference between the nominal value of a receivable and its purchase price upon its transfer may be viewed as consideration under a factoring contract and thus subject to value added tax (VAT).
The case identifying information is: 4 Afs 143/2018
At issue was the regular purchasing of short-term receivables that were not overdue and were not found to be hard to recover at the time of transfer (assignment).The purchase price of the transferred receivables was set at 95.17% of their nominal value. No other consideration was owed under the factoring contract.
In the court’s opinion, the difference between the nominal amount of the receivables and their purchase price was consideration for the factoring service. The court did not accept an argument that the difference would reflect the actual economic value of the receivables at the time of their transfer.
The court also did not accept an argument that a transfer of a receivable at a price lower than its nominal value was not a provision of a service for consideration. The court distinguished this situation from those in two cases from the Court of Justice of the European Union, by pointing out that in this case, the difference between the nominal value of the receivables and their purchase price was not due to a decrease in their market value.
The court concluded that the difference (4.83%) of the receivables’ nominal value was consideration for the factoring service, and as such was subject to VAT. It was not relevant that the consideration was not explicitly agreed to in the contract.
Read a January 2019 report prepared by the KPMG member firm in the Czech Republic
© 2020 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.